Removed jobs with old ruby versions from Travis CI.#6763
Removed jobs with old ruby versions from Travis CI.#6763hsbt wants to merge 5 commits into2-0-stablefrom
Conversation
|
Oh my god, it's happening!! 🎉 🎉 Should we target this to master, and then backport it? |
|
Well, there's not much to add to master other than removing the 1.8.7 entry I guess, so separate PR's make more sense since you're branching 2-0-stable off 1-17-stable. Disregard my previous comment, it's ok like this! |
|
I have a question though, master supports |
colby-swandale
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's sooo small now! 😮 🎉
|
@bundlerbot r+ |
6763: Removed jobs with old ruby versions from Travis CI. r=colby-swandale a=hsbt I removed the ruby versions under the Ruby 2.2. We need to fix gemspec and other parameters of .travis.yml. But this is the first step of Bundler-2.0.0 reboot. Co-authored-by: SHIBATA Hiroshi <hsbt@ruby-lang.org>
|
@deivid-rodriguez I removed Ruby 2.2 and picked some jobs from the master branch 👍 |
|
Because Bundler 2 has not been released yet, we're still accepting PRs for Bundler 1 and this shouldn't be merged into |
|
Ah, |
6763: Removed jobs with old ruby versions from Travis CI. r=colby-swandale a=hsbt I removed the ruby versions under the Ruby 2.2. We need to fix gemspec and other parameters of .travis.yml. But this is the first step of Bundler-2.0.0 reboot. Co-authored-by: SHIBATA Hiroshi <hsbt@ruby-lang.org> (cherry picked from commit 67771c0)
Timed out |
6764: Remove unnecessary stuff from specs r=colby-swandale a=deivid-rodriguez I wrote this patch a while ago but I didn't propose it because I didn't think it would be accepted. Now I think we're ready. ### What was the end-user problem that led to this PR? The problem was that the specs have a lot of conditional behavior on `Gem::VERSION`. ### What was your diagnosis of the problem? My diagnosis was that this was necessary because of testing against a big range of rubygems versions on the latest stable branch. ### What is your fix for the problem, implemented in this PR? My fix is to remove all the conditionals since we'll no longer test against rubygems versions that old on the latest stable, once #6763 lands. ### Why did you choose this fix out of the possible options? I chose this fix because it makes test code simpler. Co-authored-by: David Rodríguez <deivid.rodriguez@riseup.net>
e4b497a to
56a4bb8
Compare
6763: Removed jobs with old ruby versions from Travis CI. r=colby-swandale a=hsbt I removed the ruby versions under the Ruby 2.2. We need to fix gemspec and other parameters of .travis.yml. But this is the first step of Bundler-2.0.0 reboot. Co-authored-by: SHIBATA Hiroshi <hsbt@ruby-lang.org> (cherry picked from commit 67771c0)
|
This pull request has been merged at 9ecc86f |
6764: Remove unnecessary stuff from specs r=colby-swandale a=deivid-rodriguez I wrote this patch a while ago but I didn't propose it because I didn't think it would be accepted. Now I think we're ready. The problem was that the specs have a lot of conditional behavior on `Gem::VERSION`. My diagnosis was that this was necessary because of testing against a big range of rubygems versions on the latest stable branch. My fix is to remove all the conditionals since we'll no longer test against rubygems versions that old on the latest stable, once #6763 lands. I chose this fix because it makes test code simpler. Co-authored-by: David Rodríguez <deivid.rodriguez@riseup.net> (cherry picked from commit 27ab011)
I removed the ruby versions under the Ruby 2.2. We need to fix gemspec and other parameters of .travis.yml. But this is the first step of Bundler-2.0.0 reboot.