ROR note

[maelle]

No description provided.

[steffilazerte]

Hi @maelle,
Very interesting, and actually more complex than I thought!

The only thing I think I would add is a bit of rOpenSci context. It makes sense that if you already had rOpenSci as an author, you would simply add the ROR.

But this might make people think that they should be adding rOpenSci as some sort of role. Did you want to speak a bit to when people should add an organization? And whether or not they should add rOpenSci as an ROR to their packages? Is it only when the ROR is a copyright holder? What exactly does it imply?

Thanks!

• post follows Content Guidelines
• post follows Style Guide
• title is in Title Case
• publication date is ok
• alternative text of images is informative
• author metadata is provided with correct folder name
• html not included in pull request of Rmd post
• I ran roblog::ro_lint_md() on index.md
• I ran roblog::ro_check_urls() on index.md
• I ran a spell-check on index.md
• YAML subject tags are ok ("tech notes" for tech notes; "community" for non-staff non-editor)
• YAML field 'editor' is filled with your name
• YAML field 'translator' is filled as needed I don't think this is to be translated, right?
• YAML field 'preface' is present if necessary
• YAML field 'params.doi' is filled with a new DOI

[maelle]

Thanks so much @steffilazerte!!