Refactor tests to simplify and inline test cases

Source/Moq.Analyzers.Test/AbstractClassTests.ShouldFailOnGenericTypesWithMismatchArgs.verified.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+Diagnostic 1
+	Id: Moq1002
+	Location: SourceFile(Test0.cs[608..614))
+	Highlight: ("42")
+	Lines: var mock = new Mock<AbstractGenericClassWithCtor<object>>("42");
+	Severity: Warning
+	Message: Parameters provided into mock do not match any existing constructors.
+
+Diagnostic 2
+	Id: Moq1002
+	Location: SourceFile(Test0.cs[788..798))
+	Highlight: ("42", 42)
+	Lines: var mock1 = new Mock<AbstractGenericClassWithCtor<object>>("42", 42);
+	Severity: Warning
+	Message: Parameters provided into mock do not match any existing constructors.
+
+Diagnostic 3
+	Id: Moq1002
+	Location: SourceFile(Test0.cs[934..938))
+	Highlight: (42)
+	Lines: var mock2 = new Mock<AbstractGenericClassDefaultCtor<object>>(42);
+	Severity: Warning
+	Message: Parameters provided into mock do not match any existing constructors.
+

Source/Moq.Analyzers.Test/AbstractClassTests.ShouldFailOnMismatchArgs.verified.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+Diagnostic 1
+	Id: Moq1002
+	Location: SourceFile(Test0.cs[526..532))
+	Highlight: ("42")
+	Lines: var mock = new Mock<AbstractClassWithCtor>("42");
+	Severity: Warning
+	Message: Parameters provided into mock do not match any existing constructors.
+
+Diagnostic 2
+	Id: Moq1002
+	Location: SourceFile(Test0.cs[691..701))
+	Highlight: ("42", 42)
+	Lines: var mock1 = new Mock<AbstractClassWithCtor>("42", 42);
+	Severity: Warning
+	Message: Parameters provided into mock do not match any existing constructors.
+
+Diagnostic 3
+	Id: Moq1002
+	Location: SourceFile(Test0.cs[822..826))
+	Highlight: (42)
+	Lines: var mock2 = new Mock<AbstractClassDefaultCtor>(42);
+	Severity: Warning
+	Message: Parameters provided into mock do not match any existing constructors.
+

Source/Moq.Analyzers.Test/AbstractClassTests.ShouldPassOnGenericTypesWithNoArgs.verified.txt

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+emptyString

Source/Moq.Analyzers.Test/AbstractClassTests.ShouldPassWithArgsPassed.verified.txt

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+emptyString

Source/Moq.Analyzers.Test/AbstractClassTests.ShouldPassWithNoArgs.verified.txt

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+emptyString

Source/Moq.Analyzers.Test/AbstractClassTests.cs

@@ -7,15 +7,234 @@ namespace Moq.Analyzers.Test;
 
 public class AbstractClassTests : DiagnosticVerifier
 {
+    // TODO: Review use of `.As<>()` in the test cases. It is not clear what purpose it serves.
     [Fact]
-    public Task ShouldPassIfGoodParametersAndFailOnTypeMismatch()
+    public Task ShouldFailOnGenericTypesWithMismatchArgs()
     {
         return Verify(VerifyCSharpDiagnostic(
             [
-                File.ReadAllText("Data/AbstractClass.Good.cs"),
-                File.ReadAllText("Data/AbstractClass.Bad.cs")
-            ]
-        ));
+                """
+                namespace Moq.Analyzers.Test.Data.AbstractClass.GenericMistmatchArgs;
+
+                internal abstract class AbstractGenericClassDefaultCtor<T>
+                {
+                    protected AbstractGenericClassDefaultCtor()
+                    {
+                    }
+                }
+
+                internal abstract class AbstractGenericClassWithCtor<T>
+                {
+                    protected AbstractGenericClassWithCtor(int a)
+                    {
+                    }
+
+                    protected AbstractGenericClassWithCtor(int a, string b)
+                    {
+                    }
+                }
+
+                internal class MyUnitTests
+                {
+                    private void TestBadWithGeneric()
+                    {
+                        // The class has a constructor that takes an Int32 but passes a String
+                        var mock = new Mock<AbstractGenericClassWithCtor<object>>("42");
+
+                        // The class has a ctor with two arguments [Int32, String], but they are passed in reverse order
+                        var mock1 = new Mock<AbstractGenericClassWithCtor<object>>("42", 42);
+
+                        // The class has a ctor but does not take any arguments
+                        var mock2 = new Mock<AbstractGenericClassDefaultCtor<object>>(42);
+                    }
+                }
+                """
+            ]));
+    }
+
+    [Fact]
+    public Task ShouldPassOnGenericTypesWithNoArgs()
+    {
+        return Verify(VerifyCSharpDiagnostic(
+            [
+                """
+                namespace Moq.Analyzers.Test.Data.AbstractClass.GenericNoArgs;
+
+                internal abstract class AbstractGenericClassDefaultCtor<T>
+                {
+                    protected AbstractGenericClassDefaultCtor()
+                    {
+                    }
+                }
+
+                internal class MyUnitTests
+                {
+                    private void TestForBaseGenericNoArgs()
+                    {
+                        var mock = new Mock<AbstractGenericClassDefaultCtor<object>>();
+                        mock.As<AbstractGenericClassDefaultCtor<object>>();
+
+                        var mock1 = new Mock<AbstractGenericClassDefaultCtor<object>>();
+
+                        var mock2 = new Mock<AbstractGenericClassDefaultCtor<object>>(MockBehavior.Default);
+                    }
+                }
+                """
+            ]));
+    }
+
+    [Fact]
+    public Task ShouldFailOnMismatchArgs()
+    {
+        return Verify(VerifyCSharpDiagnostic(
+            [
+                """
+                namespace Moq.Analyzers.Test.Data.AbstractClass.MismatchArgs;
+
+                internal abstract class AbstractClassDefaultCtor
+                {
+                    protected AbstractClassDefaultCtor()
+                    {
+                    }
+                }
+
+                internal abstract class AbstractClassWithCtor
+                {
+                    protected AbstractClassWithCtor(int a)
+                    {
+                    }
+
+                    protected AbstractClassWithCtor(int a, string b)
+                    {
+                    }
+                }
+
+                internal class MyUnitTests
+                {
+                    private void TestBad()
+                    {
+                        // The class has a ctor that takes an Int32 but passes a String
+                        var mock = new Mock<AbstractClassWithCtor>("42");
+
+                        // The class has a ctor with two arguments [Int32, String], but they are passed in reverse order
+                        var mock1 = new Mock<AbstractClassWithCtor>("42", 42);
+
+                        // The class has a ctor but does not take any arguments
+                        var mock2 = new Mock<AbstractClassDefaultCtor>(42);
+                    }
+                }
+                """
+            ]));
+    }
+
+    [Fact]
+    public Task ShouldPassWithNoArgs()
+    {
+        return Verify(VerifyCSharpDiagnostic(
+            [
+                """
+                namespace Moq.Analyzers.Test.Data.AbstractClass.NoArgs;
+
+                internal abstract class AbstractClassDefaultCtor
+                {
+                    protected AbstractClassDefaultCtor()
+                    {
+                    }
+                }
+
+                internal class MyUnitTests
+                {
+                    // Base case that we can handle abstract types
+                    private void TestForBaseNoArgs()
+                    {
+                        var mock = new Mock<AbstractClassDefaultCtor>();
+                        mock.As<AbstractClassDefaultCtor>();
+                    }
+                }
+                """
+            ]));
+    }
+
+    [Fact(Skip = "I think this _should_ fail, but currently passes. Tracked by #55.")]
+    public Task ShouldFailWithArgsNonePassed()
+    {
+        return Verify(VerifyCSharpDiagnostic(
+            [
+                """
+                namespace Moq.Analyzers.Test.Data.AbstractClass.WithArgsNonePassed;
+
+                internal abstract class AbstractClassWithCtor
+                {
+                    protected AbstractClassWithCtor(int a)
+                    {
+                    }
+
+                    protected AbstractClassWithCtor(int a, string b)
+                    {
+                    }
+                }
+
+                internal class MyUnitTests
+                {
+                    // This is syntatically not allowed by C#, but you can do it with Moq
+                    private void TestForBaseWithArgsNonePassed()
+                    {
+                        var mock = new Mock<AbstractClassWithCtor>();
+                        mock.As<AbstractClassWithCtor>();
+
+                        var mock2 = new Mock<AbstractClassDefaultCtor>(MockBehavior.Default);
+                    }
+                }
+                """
+            ]));
+    }
+
+    [Fact]
+    public Task ShouldPassWithArgsPassed()
+    {
+        return Verify(VerifyCSharpDiagnostic(
+            [
+                """
+                namespace Moq.Analyzers.Test.DataAbstractClass.WithArgsPassed;
+
+                internal abstract class AbstractGenericClassWithCtor<T>
+                {
+                    protected AbstractGenericClassWithCtor(int a)
+                    {
+                    }
+
+                    protected AbstractGenericClassWithCtor(int a, string b)
+                    {
+                    }
+                }
+
+                internal abstract class AbstractClassWithCtor
+                {
+                    protected AbstractClassWithCtor(int a)
+                    {
+                    }
+
+                    protected AbstractClassWithCtor(int a, string b)
+                    {
+                    }
+                }
+
+                internal class MyUnitTests
+                {
+                    private void TestForBaseWithArgsPassed()
+                    {
+                        var mock = new Mock<AbstractClassWithCtor>(42);
+                        var mock2 = new Mock<AbstractClassWithCtor>(MockBehavior.Default, 42);
+
+                        var mock3 = new Mock<AbstractClassWithCtor>(42, "42");
+                        var mock4 = new Mock<AbstractClassWithCtor>(MockBehavior.Default, 42, "42");
+
+                        var mock5 = new Mock<AbstractGenericClassWithCtor<object>>(42);
+                        var mock6 = new Mock<AbstractGenericClassWithCtor<object>>(MockBehavior.Default, 42);
+                    }
+                }
+                """
+            ]));
     }
 
     protected override DiagnosticAnalyzer GetCSharpDiagnosticAnalyzer()

Source/Moq.Analyzers.Test/AsAcceptOnlyInterfaceAnalyzerTests.ShouldFailWhenUsingAsWithAbstractClass.verified.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+Diagnostic 1
+	Id: Moq1300
+	Location: SourceFile(Test0.cs[292..307))
+	Highlight: BaseSampleClass
+	Lines: mock.As<BaseSampleClass>();
+	Severity: Error
+	Message: Mock.As() should take interfaces only
+

Source/Moq.Analyzers.Test/AsAcceptOnlyInterfaceAnalyzerTests.ShouldFailWhenUsingAsWithConcreteClass.verified.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+Diagnostic 1
+	Id: Moq1300
+	Location: SourceFile(Test0.cs[433..443))
+	Highlight: OtherClass
+	Lines: mock.As<OtherClass>();
+	Severity: Error
+	Message: Mock.As() should take interfaces only
+

Source/Moq.Analyzers.Test/AsAcceptOnlyInterfaceAnalyzerTests.ShouldPassWhenUsingAsWithInterface.verified.txt

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+emptyString

Source/Moq.Analyzers.Test/AsAcceptOnlyInterfaceAnalyzerTests.ShouldPassWhenUsingAsWithInterfaceWithSetup.verified.txt

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+emptyString