Skip to content

document error on noisy qcs qpu request#1367

Merged
notmgsk merged 1 commit intorcfrom
fix_get_qc_noisy_docs
Jul 30, 2021
Merged

document error on noisy qcs qpu request#1367
notmgsk merged 1 commit intorcfrom
fix_get_qc_noisy_docs

Conversation

@erichulburd
Copy link
Contributor

@erichulburd erichulburd commented Jul 15, 2021

Description

Insert your PR description here. Thanks for contributing to pyQuil! 🙂

Checklist

  • The PR targets the rc branch (not master).
  • Commit messages are prefixed with one of the prefixes outlined in the commit syntax checker (see pattern field).
  • The above description motivates these changes.
  • There is a unit test that covers these changes.
  • All new and existing tests pass locally and on the PR's checks.
  • Parameters and return values have type hints with PEP 484 syntax.
  • Functions and classes have useful Sphinx-style docstrings.
  • All code follows Black style and obeys flake8 conventions.
  • (New Feature) The docs have been updated accordingly.
  • (Bugfix) The associated issue is referenced above using auto-close keywords.
  • The changelog is updated, including author and PR number (@username, Test ignore #1234).

@erichulburd erichulburd requested a review from a team as a code owner July 15, 2021 22:48
@erichulburd erichulburd force-pushed the fix_get_qc_noisy_docs branch from d1e2e3e to c4e0cdd Compare July 15, 2021 22:49
@notmgsk notmgsk merged commit 6d8e1df into rc Jul 30, 2021
@rigetti-githubbot
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 3.0.1-rc.1 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

@rigetti-githubbot
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 3.0.1 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

@dbanty dbanty deleted the fix_get_qc_noisy_docs branch February 14, 2022 17:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants