SDK batching/revamp 2.1: clock example for Rust
#2000
Conversation
teh-cmc
added
examples
teh-cmc
force-pushed
the
cmc/sdk_revamp/21_clock
branch
from
e4d53b8
to
c2e39a2
Compare
| #[rustfmt::skip] | ||
| log_hand(rec_stream, "seconds", step, (step % 60) as f32 / 60.0, LENGTH_S, WIDTH_S, 0)?; | ||
| #[rustfmt::skip] | ||
| log_hand(rec_stream, "minutes", step, (step % 3600) as f32 / 3600.0, LENGTH_M, WIDTH_M, 128)?; | ||
| #[rustfmt::skip] | ||
| log_hand(rec_stream, "hours", step, (step % 43200) as f32 / 43200.0, LENGTH_H, WIDTH_H, 255)?; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
#[rustfmt::skip] doesn't work on a block?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Not on expressions, it's been nightly-only since the dawn of time... 😒
There was a problem hiding this comment.
looks like you need to update cargo.lock again, noticed only when switching to a different branch now:
diff --git a/Cargo.lock b/Cargo.lock
index 304bd0417..2124b977e 100644
--- a/Cargo.lock
+++ b/Cargo.lock
@@ -773,7 +773,7 @@ name = "clock"
version = "0.6.0-alpha.0"
dependencies = [
"anyhow",
- "clap 4.1.4",
+ "clap 4.1.14",
"glam",
"rerun",
]
|
ah too late, uhoh. Guess this might give @jprochazk the main ci failure test 😄 |
|
Argh, these things drive me insane. Eh, it'll get lazily fixed by the next PR I guess... |
|
Which will be in about ten minutes thanks to #2026 👀 |
|
Doesn't seem to have caused a failure 😢 |
Yeah I'm not surprised: outdated lock files are annoying because they screw with everyone's local copy, but I don't remember we ever configured anything to detect these situations on the CI. |
What the title says.
On top of #1983