Skip to content

Conversation

grtlr
Copy link
Contributor

@grtlr grtlr commented Jul 10, 2025

Related

What

This removes the remaining reference to indicators from our codebase. Most notably this removes indicators from the dataframe queries and the UI.

This should be fine because:

  • We drop indicator columns during Sorbet migration
  • By default indicators where not shown anyways
  • And they were omitted in queries by default too.

Important

There is some risk that this PR will make indicators appear again, so we should choose a good time to merge this PR. If they show up again then let's fix the root cause (i.e. migration logic).

TODO

@grtlr grtlr added 📺 re_viewer affects re_viewer itself include in changelog 🪵 Log & send APIs Affects the user-facing API for all languages feat-dataframe-view Everything related to the dataframe view feat-dataframe-api Everything related to the dataframe API labels Jul 10, 2025
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 10, 2025

Latest documentation preview deployed successfully.

Result Commit Link
06bfb82 https://landing-pa3qbqp2r-rerun.vercel.app/docs

Note: This comment is updated whenever you push a commit.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 10, 2025

Web viewer built successfully. If applicable, you should also test it:

  • I have tested the web viewer
Result Commit Link Manifest
760fc2e https://rerun.io/viewer/pr/10584 +nightly +main

Note: This comment is updated whenever you push a commit.

@grtlr grtlr requested a review from abey79 July 10, 2025 11:37
Copy link
Member

@abey79 abey79 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Had a cursory look, didn't see anything shocking. Thanks for pulling that off

Comment on lines 613 to 616
pub fn header_cell_margin(&self, _table_style: TableStyle) -> Margin {
Margin::symmetric(8, 6)
}

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this an easter egg to test the reviewer? :)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ahaha, nah just a bad rebase. The diff should be much nicer now that #10581 is merged.

@grtlr grtlr force-pushed the grtlr/remove-is-indicator-from-dataframe branch from 06bfb82 to 346f250 Compare July 10, 2025 18:37
@grtlr grtlr changed the title Removes remnants of indicators from dataframe queries and viewer. Removes remnants of indicators from dataframe queries and viewer Jul 10, 2025
@grtlr grtlr marked this pull request as ready for review July 10, 2025 18:41
@grtlr grtlr force-pushed the grtlr/remove-is-indicator-from-dataframe branch from 346f250 to 923696f Compare July 10, 2025 18:49
@grtlr
Copy link
Contributor Author

grtlr commented Jul 10, 2025

@rerun-bot full-check

Copy link

Started a full build: https://github.com/rerun-io/rerun/actions/runs/16205572522

@grtlr grtlr merged commit 0dfa857 into main Jul 11, 2025
85 of 86 checks passed
@grtlr grtlr deleted the grtlr/remove-is-indicator-from-dataframe branch July 11, 2025 09:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feat-dataframe-api Everything related to the dataframe API feat-dataframe-view Everything related to the dataframe view include in changelog 🪵 Log & send APIs Affects the user-facing API for all languages 📺 re_viewer affects re_viewer itself
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Tagged components milestone 2: no more indicators
2 participants