We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
BarChart
This would make it a lot easier to discover. We'd ofc still use the same components as in the Tensor archetype
Originally posted by @jleibs in #3323 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
New explicit archetype API for logging barcharts (#3400)
e674332
### What Introduce a barchart archetype as a semantic helper instead of just logging 1-d Tensors. Update the view to use it, and add a couple small examples. Resolves: #3327 ### Checklist * [x] I have read and agree to [Contributor Guide](https://github.com/rerun-io/rerun/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [Code of Conduct](https://github.com/rerun-io/rerun/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md) * [x] I've included a screenshot or gif (if applicable) * [x] I have tested [demo.rerun.io](https://demo.rerun.io/pr/3400) (if applicable) - [PR Build Summary](https://build.rerun.io/pr/3400) - [Docs preview](https://rerun.io/preview/4c4612a44bb1729e2234c2236cf5588c3fbaa415/docs) <!--DOCS-PREVIEW--> - [Examples preview](https://rerun.io/preview/4c4612a44bb1729e2234c2236cf5588c3fbaa415/examples) <!--EXAMPLES-PREVIEW--> - [Recent benchmark results](https://ref.rerun.io/dev/bench/) - [Wasm size tracking](https://ref.rerun.io/dev/sizes/)
jleibs
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
This would make it a lot easier to discover. We'd ofc still use the same components as in the Tensor archetype
Originally posted by @jleibs in #3323 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: