chore/schema handshake metadata pt2 #74
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
blast-hardcheese
requested review from
jackyzha0
and removed request for
a team
blast-hardcheese
force-pushed
the
dstewart/chore/schema-handshakeMetadata-pt2
branch
from
ca437f5 to
9c1ebbc
Compare
jackyzha0
approved these changes
Aug 26, 2024
blast-hardcheese
deleted the
dstewart/chore/schema-handshakeMetadata-pt2
branch
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why
Follow-up to #72 to account for
schema.jsonfiles without metadata.What changed
If the
handshakeSchemafield is defined, then the parameter is required. Otherwise, the parameter isLiteral[None], which matches the previous behavior of the default.Due to the metadata field now being required, I had to remove the
= Nonedefault parameter. I think this is alright.It'll mean that #73 will likely need to change to
handshake_metadata_factory: HandshakeType | Callable[[], Awaitable[HandshakeType]]to avoidasync def stub() -> None: return Nonejust to satisfy the async requirement. It's somewhat challenging to capture the exact semantics we want here, but I think that's alright.Test plan
Do typechecks pass?