Skip to content

feat(manager/mise): add support for rustfs#43054

Closed
mnm364 wants to merge 1 commit into
renovatebot:mainfrom
mnm364:feat/mise-rustfs
Closed

feat(manager/mise): add support for rustfs#43054
mnm364 wants to merge 1 commit into
renovatebot:mainfrom
mnm364:feat/mise-rustfs

Conversation

@mnm364
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@mnm364 mnm364 commented May 1, 2026

Changes

Adds rustfs (RustFS) to the set of mise tools that renovate can manage. RustFS is an Apache-2.0, S3-compatible object storage system written in Rust, published as GitHub releases at rustfs/rustfs. Tags follow semver (e.g. `1.0.0-beta.1`) so the default `GithubReleasesDatasource` works without an `extractVersion` override.

This pairs with jdx/mise#9530, which adds the corresponding `registry/rustfs.toml` (github backend). After both land, users can drop manual `# renovate:` overrides and rely on the registry name:

```toml
[tools]
rustfs = "1.0.0-beta.1"
```

Context

  • This doesn't close an Issue, but I accept the risk that this PR may be closed if maintainers disagree with its opening or implementation

AI assistance disclosure

  • Yes — substantive assistance (AI-generated non-trivial portions of code, tests, and documentation).

Documentation (please check one with an [x])

  • No documentation update is required

How I've tested my work (please select one)

I have verified these changes via:

  • Newly added/modified unit tests

`pnpm vitest run lib/modules/manager/mise/extract.spec.ts` and `pnpm vitest run lib/modules/manager/index.spec.ts` both pass.

Adds `rustfs` to the set of mise tools that renovate can manage. RustFS
is an Apache-2.0, S3-compatible object storage system written in Rust,
published as GitHub releases at `rustfs/rustfs`. Versions follow semver
(e.g. `1.0.0-beta.1`) so the default `GithubReleasesDatasource` works
without an `extractVersion` override.

This pairs with the corresponding mise registry entry in
jdx/mise#9530.
@mnm364 mnm364 marked this pull request as ready for review May 2, 2026 00:03
@github-actions github-actions Bot requested a review from viceice May 2, 2026 00:03
@jamietanna
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We should be able to automagically support this through #42783 (there's an issue with the automated update of tool support we need to fix) but there shouldn't need to be any manual work for adding support 🤞🏼

@viceice
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

viceice commented May 4, 2026

closing in favor of

@viceice viceice closed this May 4, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 4, 2026
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants