Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

add support for new OpenAI models, update pricing #339

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 16, 2023
Merged

add support for new OpenAI models, update pricing #339

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 16, 2023

Conversation

nihit
Copy link
Contributor

@nihit nihit commented Jun 16, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Support for gpt-3.5-turbo-0613, gpt-3.5-turbo-16k and updated pricing for gpt-3.5-turbo models

Tested civil comments with the following model config:

 "model": {
        "provider": "openai",
        "name": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0613"
    }

nihit
nihit commented Jun 16, 2023
View reviewed changes
tests/unit/llm_test.py
@@ -77,7 +77,6 @@ def test_gpt35_label(mocker):
)
x = model.label(prompts)
assert [i[0].text for i in x[0].generations] == ["Answers", "Answers"]
assert x[1] == approx(1.2e-05, rel=1e-3)
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this function checks for labeling only. we should test for pricing only it the following test after this one

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cleaning up

@nihit nihit merged commit 19f21f0 into main Jun 16, 2023
@nihit nihit deleted the 0316 branch June 16, 2023 23:44
@nihit nihit mentioned this pull request Jun 16, 2023
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@DhruvaBansal00 DhruvaBansal00 DhruvaBansal00 approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@nihit @DhruvaBansal00