Skip to content

Conversation

@JakeSCahill
Copy link
Contributor

@JakeSCahill JakeSCahill commented Oct 29, 2025

Description

Resolves https://redpandadata.atlassian.net/browse/DOC-1690

This pull request introduces automated generation and updating of Redpanda property documentation and related reference files, along with some configuration and metadata updates. The main focus is on improving the accuracy and maintainability of property docs by using a GitHub Actions workflow and updating version references and property mappings.

Automated documentation and reference updates:

  • Added a new GitHub Actions workflow (.github/workflows/update-property-docs.yml) to automatically generate property documentation, create pull requests for updates, and manage AWS credentials/secrets for secure automation.
  • Autogenerated new partials: modules/reference/partials/deprecated/deprecated-properties.adoc lists all deprecated configuration properties, and modules/reference/partials/topic-property-mappings.adoc maps topic properties to their corresponding cluster properties. These files are now maintained via automation and should not be edited manually. [1] [2]
  • Added a reference change log file (modules/reference/property-changes-v25.2.1-to-v25.2.10.json) summarizing property changes between versions, including changed defaults and types.

Configuration and metadata updates:

  • Updated antora.yml to reference the latest Redpanda release tag (v25.2.10), standardized YAML formatting, and improved home page and navigation metadata for clarity and consistency. [1] [2]
  • Updated local-antora-playbook.yml to include new branches and start paths for documentation sources, ensuring the latest docs and labs content are included in local builds.

Page previews

Checks

  • New feature
  • Content gap
  • Support Follow-up
  • Small fix (typos, links, copyedits, etc)

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 29, 2025

Deploy Preview for redpanda-docs-preview ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 160f365
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/redpanda-docs-preview/deploys/6904e546223aad0008dc7761
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1428--redpanda-docs-preview.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 29, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This PR introduces infrastructure for automating property documentation generation. It adds a GitHub Actions workflow triggered on repository tags that compares version semantics, generates property documentation using doc-tools, and opens pull requests with the generated content. Supporting changes include modifying configuration files (antora.yml and local-antora-playbook.yml), converting inline property documentation to modular include directives across broker, object-storage, and topic property pages, adding autogenerated documentation partials for broker properties, topic properties, deprecated properties, and property mappings, and updating version-specific property changes in a JSON tracking file.

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant GitHub as GitHub Event
    participant Workflow as update-property-docs<br/>Workflow
    participant AWS as AWS Secrets<br/>Manager
    participant DocTools as doc-tools
    participant CreatePR as create-pull-request
    participant Repo as Repository

    GitHub->>Workflow: workflow_dispatch or<br/>repository_dispatch triggered
    Workflow->>AWS: Fetch AWS credentials
    AWS-->>Workflow: Credentials retrieved
    Workflow->>Repo: Checkout & setup Node.js
    Workflow->>Workflow: Extract tag from input<br/>or dispatch payload
    Workflow->>Workflow: Compare tag to latest<br/>in antora.yml using semver
    alt Tag is newer
        rect rgb(200, 240, 200)
            note right of Workflow: Generate Docs Path
            Workflow->>DocTools: Generate property docs<br/>with specified options
            DocTools-->>Workflow: Property docs generated
            Workflow->>CreatePR: Create PR with generated<br/>docs & commit message
            CreatePR-->>Repo: PR opened
        end
    else Tag not newer
        rect rgb(240, 200, 200)
            note right of Workflow: Skip Path
            Workflow->>Workflow: Log skip notice
        end
    end
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~50 minutes

  • The new GitHub Actions workflow introduces conditional version-comparison logic and orchestrates multiple external tools (AWS Secrets Manager, doc-tools, create-pull-request action); review should verify tag-handling, semver comparisons, and PR generation correctness.
  • Multiple autogenerated documentation partials (broker-properties.adoc, topic-properties.adoc, deprecated-properties.adoc) contain large volumes of property definitions and cross-references; verify generation output accuracy and consistency.
  • Systematic refactoring across property documentation pages (broker, topic, object-storage) replaces inline content with include directives; confirm all includes resolve correctly and no content is lost.
  • Configuration changes to antora.yml (version updates, formatting normalization) and local-antora-playbook.yml (branch/path filters) should be validated against intended documentation build behavior.
  • Property metadata changes in JSON file (type conversions, default value updates) require verification against actual property definitions.

Possibly related PRs

  • properties + sec: broker properties updates #1298: Modifies broker properties documentation to add and expand broker property definitions, directly overlapping with this PR's broker-properties.adoc changes and autogenerated partials.
  • Topic props #1337: Makes substantive changes to topic properties documentation organization and adds topic-properties content, directly related to this PR's topic-properties refactoring and autogenerated partials.
  • Properties v25.1 #1244: Modifies generated property documentation assets including object-storage and deprecated properties, sharing the same autogeneration infrastructure and output files.

Suggested reviewers

  • paulohtb6
  • Feediver1
  • BenPope

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (2 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The PR title 'Config automation' is vague and generic, using a non-descriptive term that does not clearly convey the main purpose of the changeset. While it relates to the general domain of configuration automation, it does not specify that this PR introduces a GitHub Actions workflow for automated property documentation generation, which is the primary change. A teammate scanning through PR history would struggle to understand what this PR actually accomplishes. Consider using a more specific and descriptive title such as 'Add GitHub Actions workflow for automated property docs generation' or 'Automate property documentation updates via GitHub Actions' to better communicate the main objective of the PR to other team members.
Linked Issues check ❓ Inconclusive The PR addresses the primary requirements from DOC-1690 by implementing a GitHub Actions workflow that automates property documentation generation. The workflow is triggered via workflow_dispatch and repository_dispatch (supporting tag-based triggers), generates documentation using doc-tools, and creates pull requests for updates. The PR includes AWS credentials configuration and secrets management as required. However, the implementation does not explicitly show the diff generation between releases or the wiki link in the PR description as specified in the issue requirements, and there is no evidence of the secondary requirement (cloudv2 repository trigger) being implemented. Verify that the workflow implementation includes mechanisms to generate and embed release diffs in PR descriptions, and confirm whether the secondary requirement for cloudv2 repository automation is addressed in this PR or planned for a separate submission. Clarify in the PR comments or documentation if the diff and wiki link features are deferred to future iterations.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description check ✅ Passed The PR description is mostly complete and follows the required template structure with sections for Description, Page previews, and Checks. It clearly explains the main objectives including the GitHub Actions workflow addition, autogenerated partials, configuration updates, and references the linked Jira ticket (DOC-1690). However, the Page previews section is empty (as is common for infrastructure/workflow changes), and the review deadline field is missing, which are minor omissions that do not significantly impact the overall quality of the description.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed While the primary focus is on the GitHub Actions workflow for automated property documentation, the PR also includes several configuration and metadata updates (antora.yml, local-antora-playbook.yml) and new autogenerated documentation partials. These changes appear to be related to supporting the automation workflow and represent property documentation improvements rather than out-of-scope additions. All changes align with the general objective of improving property documentation accuracy and maintainability.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch config-automation

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@JakeSCahill JakeSCahill marked this pull request as ready for review November 3, 2025 17:14
@JakeSCahill JakeSCahill requested a review from a team as a code owner November 3, 2025 17:14
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/update-property-docs.yml (2)

62-83: Version comparison logic is sound but could benefit from input validation.

The semver comparison correctly:

  • Strips the leading 'v' prefix from both versions
  • Uses sort -V for semantic version ordering
  • Requires the new version to be strictly greater than the current version

However, the logic doesn't validate that the stripped version strings are valid semver. If malformed tags are provided, sort -V may produce unexpected results. Consider adding a validation step before comparison.

Consider adding validation:

# Example: validate semver format before comparison
if ! [[ "$CUR_NUM" =~ ^[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+(-[a-zA-Z0-9]+)?$ ]]; then
  echo "❌ Invalid semver format: $CUR_NUM" >&2
  exit 1
fi

98-108: PR creation is well-configured with appropriate automation labels.

The pull request creation step uses:

  • Consistent commit message and branch naming with the tag
  • Appropriate auto-docs label for filtering and tracking
  • Clear PR title and body

One suggestion: include a link to the internal wiki with review instructions (as mentioned in DOC-1690 objectives). Update the body to include guidance.

Consider enhancing the PR body with review instructions:

body: |
  This PR auto-generates updated Redpanda property documentation for **${{ steps.tag.outputs.tag }}**.
  
  **Review instructions:** See [Property Documentation Review Guide](https://redpandadata.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/DOC/pages/1396244485/Review+Redpanda+configuration+properties)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Disabled knowledge base sources:

  • Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 511b143 and 160f365.

📒 Files selected for processing (11)
  • .github/workflows/update-property-docs.yml (1 hunks)
  • antora.yml (2 hunks)
  • local-antora-playbook.yml (1 hunks)
  • modules/reference/pages/properties/broker-properties.adoc (2 hunks)
  • modules/reference/pages/properties/object-storage-properties.adoc (1 hunks)
  • modules/reference/pages/properties/topic-properties.adoc (1 hunks)
  • modules/reference/partials/deprecated/deprecated-properties.adoc (1 hunks)
  • modules/reference/partials/properties/broker-properties.adoc (1 hunks)
  • modules/reference/partials/properties/topic-properties.adoc (1 hunks)
  • modules/reference/partials/topic-property-mappings.adoc (1 hunks)
  • modules/reference/property-changes-v25.2.1-to-v25.2.10.json (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (5)
📚 Learning: 2025-07-16T19:33:20.420Z
Learnt from: Feediver1
Repo: redpanda-data/docs PR: 1153
File: modules/reference/pages/properties/topic-properties.adoc:45-50
Timestamp: 2025-07-16T19:33:20.420Z
Learning: In the Redpanda documentation, topic property cross-references like <<max.compaction.lag.ms>> and <<min.compaction.lag.ms>> require corresponding property definition sections with anchors like [[maxcompactionlagms]] and [[mincompactionlagms]] to prevent broken links.

Applied to files:

  • modules/reference/partials/deprecated/deprecated-properties.adoc
  • modules/reference/partials/topic-property-mappings.adoc
  • modules/reference/partials/properties/broker-properties.adoc
  • modules/reference/pages/properties/topic-properties.adoc
  • modules/reference/pages/properties/object-storage-properties.adoc
  • modules/reference/pages/properties/broker-properties.adoc
  • modules/reference/partials/properties/topic-properties.adoc
📚 Learning: 2025-07-14T19:28:43.296Z
Learnt from: Feediver1
Repo: redpanda-data/docs PR: 1153
File: antora.yml:3-5
Timestamp: 2025-07-14T19:28:43.296Z
Learning: In Redpanda docs, during beta releases, the version metadata may intentionally show inconsistencies where the header displays the beta version (e.g., 25.2 Beta) while internal attributes like full-version, latest-redpanda-tag, operator-beta-tag still reference the stable version (e.g., 25.1). This is resolved during the GA merge process when all version references are synchronized.

Applied to files:

  • antora.yml
📚 Learning: 2025-05-07T01:06:00.937Z
Learnt from: kbatuigas
Repo: redpanda-data/docs PR: 1113
File: modules/manage/partials/iceberg/use-iceberg-catalogs.adoc:100-107
Timestamp: 2025-05-07T01:06:00.937Z
Learning: In AsciiDoc documentation for Redpanda, the syntax `+` and `--` around content blocks within a `[tabs]` section are valid AsciiDoc formatting elements for tabbed content. The `+` after a tab name (like `rpk::`) indicates that the following block belongs to that tab, and the `--` markers enclose the content for that tab. These are not diff artifacts and should not be removed.

Applied to files:

  • antora.yml
📚 Learning: 2025-08-19T19:26:57.364Z
Learnt from: paulohtb6
Repo: redpanda-data/docs PR: 1324
File: modules/deploy/partials/high-availability.adoc:537-537
Timestamp: 2025-08-19T19:26:57.364Z
Learning: In AsciiDoc documentation, page aliases (`:page-aliases:`) should never be removed as they serve as old redirects to maintain backward compatibility when pages are moved or renamed. They preserve SEO and prevent broken links for users.

Applied to files:

  • antora.yml
📚 Learning: 2025-08-08T00:44:07.530Z
Learnt from: paulohtb6
Repo: redpanda-data/docs PR: 1298
File: modules/deploy/pages/deployment-option/self-hosted/manual/production/production-readiness.adoc:405-406
Timestamp: 2025-08-08T00:44:07.530Z
Learning: In AsciiDoc documentation, properties defined as level 3 headings (===) automatically generate anchors from the heading text. Manual [[anchor]] definitions are only needed for property names with special characters (like dots) or when customizing anchor names differs from the heading text.

Applied to files:

  • modules/reference/partials/properties/topic-properties.adoc
🔇 Additional comments (17)
local-antora-playbook.yml (1)

20-20: Config additions align with local build requirements.

The branch filter for cloud-docs and start_paths for docs-site follow standard Antora conventions. Ensure that anyone running local builds is aware that config-automation branch for cloud-docs must exist for the playbook to work.

Also applies to: 23-23

modules/reference/partials/deprecated/deprecated-properties.adoc (1)

1-106: Autogenerated deprecated properties list is well-structured.

The organization by property type (Broker vs Cluster) and simple bullet-point format is appropriate for a reference list. The autogenerated header and override instructions provide clear guidance.

Note: Ensure the doc-tools generation continues to keep this file synchronized with the actual deprecated properties in the codebase, as this is now a versioned artifact.

modules/reference/property-changes-v25.2.1-to-v25.2.10.json (1)

1-50: Version tracking JSON is properly structured.

The metadata and property change details are well-formatted, with summary counts matching the details array. The three properties documented show reasonable changes (type conversions and default updates).

modules/reference/partials/properties/topic-properties.adoc (2)

1-50: Topic properties documentation is well-organized and comprehensive.

The file provides excellent coverage with:

  • Logical categorization by functional area (retention, compaction, segments, schema registry, etc.)
  • Consistent metadata for each property (type, accepted values, defaults, nullability)
  • Helpful cross-references to related cluster properties
  • Conditional content for cloud vs self-managed environments
  • Related topics sections with relevant documentation links

571-586: Exclusion tags confirmed at specified locations.

Verification confirms both properties are indeed tagged with exclude-from-docs:

  • redpanda.remote.allowgaps at lines 571–586
  • redpanda.virtual.cluster.id at lines 747–762

The review comment's factual claims are accurate. However, determining whether this exclusion is intentional requires domain knowledge and design context beyond code inspection. Manual verification is needed to confirm these properties should remain excluded from published documentation.

antora.yml (3)

15-15: Latest Redpanda tag updated to v25.2.10.

The latest-redpanda-tag is updated from its previous value to v25.2.10, which aligns with the PR's objective of generating property docs for this version. This tag is used by the update-property-docs workflow for version comparison.


29-32: Version metadata and badge configuration updated.

Supported versions for RHEL, Ubuntu are reformatted (removing unnecessary quotes), and the deprecated badge is updated with proper AsciiDoc xref syntax. These maintenance updates follow best practices.


6-6: Navigation file verified and exists.

The modules/ROOT/nav.adoc file referenced on line 6 is present in the repository. The documentation build will proceed without issues from this addition.

.github/workflows/update-property-docs.yml (3)

1-112: GitHub Actions workflow implements core automation requirements effectively.

The workflow successfully:

  • Triggers on both manual and repository dispatch events
  • Securely handles AWS credentials and GitHub token
  • Compares semantic versions to determine if doc generation is needed
  • Conditionally generates docs and opens PRs to avoid unnecessary operations
  • Uses consistent labeling and naming for tracking

The implementation aligns with the PR objectives for automating property documentation generation. Address the minor concerns about secret path formatting and property overrides file verification before merging.


32-34: No issues found—secret path format is correct.

The leading comma in ,sdlc/prod/github/actions_bot_token on line 33 is intentional. The format ",secretId" is a blank alias that uses parsed-JSON keys or default naming, which aligns with parse-json-secrets: true on line 34. This follows the documented behavior of the aws-actions/aws-secretsmanager-get-secrets action.


85-96: All verification checks passed — the code is correct.

  1. docs-data/property-overrides.json exists and contains valid JSON
  2. doc-tools is properly installed via @redpanda-data/docs-extensions-and-macros (version ^4.0.0), made available to the workflow through npm ci
  3. GITHUB_TOKEN environment variable is correctly set from the AWS Secrets Manager secret (ACTIONS_BOT_TOKEN)

The --cloud-support flag is used in the active workflow with no evidence of issues, and the --overrides option is documented in the autogenerated property files, confirming the tool's support for these flags.

modules/reference/partials/properties/broker-properties.adoc (1)

421-491: Data inconsistency detected in autogenerated properties documentation.

The file uses category tags (category-redpanda, category-pandaproxy) to organize properties for targeted inclusion, resulting in intentional duplication. However, cloud_storage_inventory_hash_path_directory has conflicting metadata between its two instances:

  • Line 421: *Nullable:* No
  • Line 458: *Nullable:* Yes

Since this file is autogenerated (as noted in the header), verify:

  1. Whether the doc generation tool is producing inconsistent output
  2. Whether content differences exist in the other 8 duplicated properties beyond the Nullable field
  3. Whether the source configuration data has conflicts
modules/reference/partials/topic-property-mappings.adoc (1)

1-48: Fix broken topic property anchors in the auto-generated mappings table.

All topic property cross-references in this file are broken. The anchors are formatted without dots/special characters (<<cleanuppolicy>>) but the actual property headings in topic-properties.adoc preserve them (=== cleanup.policy), causing AsciiDoc to auto-generate anchors that don't match (e.g., cleanup.policy instead of cleanuppolicy).

The cluster property references work correctly because they consistently use underscores throughout. Topic property anchors must either:

  1. Add explicit [[cleanuppolicy]] style anchors before each property heading in topic-properties.adoc, or
  2. Update the mappings table to reference the auto-generated anchors that preserve dots (e.g., <<cleanup.policy>> instead of <<cleanuppolicy>>)

This appears to be a bug in the doc-tools CLI auto-generation logic for topic properties.

⛔ Skipped due to learnings
Learnt from: Feediver1
Repo: redpanda-data/docs PR: 1153
File: modules/reference/pages/properties/topic-properties.adoc:45-50
Timestamp: 2025-07-16T19:33:20.420Z
Learning: In the Redpanda documentation, topic property cross-references like <<max.compaction.lag.ms>> and <<min.compaction.lag.ms>> require corresponding property definition sections with anchors like [[maxcompactionlagms]] and [[mincompactionlagms]] to prevent broken links.
Learnt from: JakeSCahill
Repo: redpanda-data/docs PR: 1304
File: modules/troubleshoot/partials/errors-and-solutions.adoc:44-44
Timestamp: 2025-08-13T16:39:20.038Z
Learning: In AsciiDoc documentation with Antora, explicit anchors like [[anchor-name]] take precedence over automatically generated anchors from headings. When troubleshooting cross-references, check for both explicit anchors and auto-generated ones from heading text (lowercase with spaces replaced by hyphens).
Learnt from: paulohtb6
Repo: redpanda-data/docs PR: 1298
File: modules/deploy/pages/deployment-option/self-hosted/manual/production/production-readiness.adoc:405-406
Timestamp: 2025-08-08T00:44:07.530Z
Learning: In AsciiDoc documentation, properties defined as level 3 headings (===) automatically generate anchors from the heading text. Manual [[anchor]] definitions are only needed for property names with special characters (like dots) or when customizing anchor names differs from the heading text.
modules/reference/pages/properties/broker-properties.adoc (3)

49-67: Clarify ownership and maintenance of the HTTP-Based Authentication section.

This new manual documentation section appears alongside autogenerated include directives. If this content is hand-written and not generated via the automation workflow, it risks diverging from autogenerated content and may become stale. Confirm whether:

  1. This section is maintained manually, or
  2. It should be included in the autogenerated partial with a specific tag (e.g., tags=http-based-auth)

If manual, document the maintenance expectation to prevent drift during future automation runs.


86-92: Verify Schema Registry example YAML alignment with partial content.

The Schema Registry example block (lines 86-92) has been modified and will appear alongside the autogenerated partial include on line 97. Ensure the example remains accurate and complementary to the properties listed in the partial. If the example is meant to be comprehensive, verify that all properties shown exist in the category-schema-registry tagged section.


47-47: The original review comment is incorrect—all required category tags are present and properly configured.

The initial verification script had a flawed search pattern. Actual inspection confirms:

  • category-redpanda, category-schema-registry, and category-pandaproxy-client tags all exist in the partial file with proper tag:: and end:: delimiters
  • Anchors are auto-generated from section headers (standard AsciiDoc behavior): === property_name creates [[property_name]] anchors
  • Cross-references in the partial (e.g., <<admin_api_tls>>) resolve correctly to these auto-generated anchors
  • Manual content in the main file (HTTP-Based Authentication section) includes an explicit anchor [[http_based_auth_method]]

The include directives at lines 47, 97, and 131 will function as intended.

Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.

modules/reference/pages/properties/object-storage-properties.adoc (1)

15-15: No issues found – the partial is properly structured with auto-generated anchors.

The partial file exists at modules/reference/partials/properties/object-storage-properties.adoc and contains 3,148 lines of autogenerated content. Each property is defined as a level 3 heading (=== property_name), which automatically generates anchors in Antora/Asciidoctor. Cross-references within the partial (e.g., <<cloud_storage_secret_key>>) correctly reference these auto-generated anchors. The include directive uses correct Antora syntax, and the tag filters are properly balanced (5 deprecated tags that will be excluded).

Comment on lines +1 to +50
// This content is autogenerated. Do not edit manually. To override descriptions, use the doc-tools CLI with the --overrides option: https://redpandadata.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/DOC/pages/1396244485/Review+Redpanda+configuration+properties
// tag::category-redpanda[]
=== admin

Network address for the glossterm:Admin API[] server.

ifndef::env-cloud[]
*Restored during xref:manage:whole-cluster-restore.adoc[Whole Cluster Restore]:* Yes
endif::[]

// tag::self-managed-only[]
*Visibility:* `user`
// end::self-managed-only[]

*Type:* array

ifdef::env-cloud[]
*Default:* Available in the Redpanda Cloud Console
endif::[]
ifndef::env-cloud[]
*Default:* `[{address: "127.0.0.1", port: 9644}]`
endif::[]

*Nullable:* No


.Example
[,yaml]
----
redpanda:
admin:
- name: <admin-api-name>
address: <external-broker-hostname>
port: <admin-api-port>
----

Replace the following placeholders with your values:

* `<admin-api-name>`: Name for the Admin API listener (TLS configuration is handled separately in the <<admin_api_tls,`admin_api_tls`>> broker property)
* `<external-broker-hostname>`: The externally accessible hostname or IP address that clients use to connect to this broker
* `<admin-api-port>`: The port number for the Admin API endpoint


---
// end::category-redpanda[]

// tag::category-redpanda[]
=== admin_api_doc_dir

Path to the API specifications for the Admin API.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical

Autogenerated file structure is comprehensive but requires deduplication.

The properties documentation is well-formatted with consistent metadata (type, defaults, visibility, examples, related topics). However, the duplicate entries must be resolved before merging. Beyond the duplicates, the file quality looks good:

  • Clear category tagging aids organization
  • Proper AsciiDoc formatting
  • Helpful examples and cross-references
  • Proper conditional formatting for cloud vs self-managed environments

Address the duplicate property definitions noted above before merging this PR.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
modules/reference/partials/properties/broker-properties.adoc lines 1-50: there
are duplicate property definitions (the "admin" property appears more than once)
which must be deduplicated before merging; locate both definitions, choose a
single canonical "admin" block that preserves full metadata (type, default,
nullable, visibility, example, and conditional cloud/self-managed sections),
merge any differing fields into that canonical block, remove the redundant
duplicate(s), keep the separate "admin_api_doc_dir" section intact, and verify
the autogenerated source or doc-tools overrides are updated so the duplicate
does not reappear.

Comment on lines +15 to +20
latest-redpanda-tag: v25.2.10
latest-console-tag: v2.8.5
latest-release-commit: 68c64fd
latest-operator-version: v2.3.8-24.3.6
operator-beta-tag: v25.1.1-beta1
helm-beta-tag: v25.1.1-beta1
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not using ' anymore?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants