Skip to content

Conversation

@slice4e
Copy link
Collaborator

@slice4e slice4e commented Jan 25, 2023

Adjusted the memory requirements for a few test cases.

@slice4e slice4e added the spec Improvements or additions to the Redis benchmarks specification label Jan 25, 2023
@slice4e slice4e requested a review from filipecosta90 January 25, 2023 23:52
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Base: 58.23% // Head: 58.27% // Increases project coverage by +0.03% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (0c5cef5) compared to base (b7a4f24).
Patch coverage: 100.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

📣 This organization is not using Codecov’s GitHub App Integration. We recommend you install it so Codecov can continue to function properly for your repositories. Learn more

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #202      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   58.23%   58.27%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          24       24              
  Lines        2088     2090       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits         1216     1218       +2     
  Misses        872      872              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
redis_benchmarks_specification/__runner__/args.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...edis_benchmarks_specification/__runner__/runner.py 69.04% <100.00%> (+0.08%) ⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@filipecosta90 filipecosta90 merged commit 5fd5958 into main Feb 1, 2023
@filipecosta90 filipecosta90 deleted the fix_memory_reqs_for_load_stream branch February 1, 2023 17:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

spec Improvements or additions to the Redis benchmarks specification

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants