-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 244
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove API Server from experimental mode, set UI Server as experimental #6985
Remove API Server from experimental mode, set UI Server as experimental #6985
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for odo-docusaurus-preview ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
/hold
Wow - we've got a lot of test failures on Windows. I think we need to set |
Flaky E2E test (#6582) /override OpenShift-Integration-tests/OpenShift-Integration-tests |
@rm3l: Overrode contexts on behalf of rm3l: OpenShift-Integration-tests/OpenShift-Integration-tests In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
There are still too many failures on Windows, related to port conflict (#6939). |
1dab6fe
to
7805867
Compare
They are enabled only if `options.StartAPIServer` is explicitly enabled. This is to avoid potential port conflicting issue, especially on Windows - see [1] [1] redhat-developer#6939
7805867
to
17edd51
Compare
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! 0 Bugs No Coverage information |
/lgtm |
@feloy: you cannot LGTM your own PR. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
@feloy: you cannot LGTM your own PR.
On your behalf ;)
(The other changes look good to me as well)
What type of PR is this:
/kind feature
What does this PR do / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #6984
PR acceptance criteria:
Unit test
Integration test
Documentation
How to test changes / Special notes to the reviewer: