Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Run service test specs in parallel #1839

Merged

Conversation

amitkrout
Copy link
Contributor

What is the purpose of this change? What does it change?

Was the change discussed in an issue?

fixes - part of #1473

How to test changes?

make test-service-e2e

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/M needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. Required by Prow. and removed size/M labels Jun 19, 2019
@amitkrout amitkrout force-pushed the serviceParallelTestRun branch from d9d575f to 0a58987 Compare June 25, 2019 15:01
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. Required by Prow. label Jun 25, 2019
@amitkrout
Copy link
Contributor Author

 Created dir: /tmp/227079855
Creating a new project: opwzmapaux
Running odo with args: [project create opwzmapaux -w -v4] 
[odo] I0625 16:22:21.997016   23031 merged_client_builder.go:122] Using in-cluster configuration
[odo] I0625 16:22:21.998807   23031 merged_client_builder.go:159] Using in-cluster namespace
[odo] I0625 16:22:21.998872   23031 preference.go:116] The configFile is /tmp/227079855/config.yaml
[odo] I0625 16:22:21.998898   23031 occlient.go:455] Trying to connect to server 172.30.0.1:443
[odo] I0625 16:22:22.000949   23031 occlient.go:462] Server https://172.30.0.1:443 is up
[odo] I0625 16:22:22.018103   23031 occlient.go:385] isLoggedIn err:  <nil> 
[odo]  output: "system:serviceaccount:ci-op-n5np26ny:default"
[odo] I0625 16:22:22.018158   23031 context.go:355] Ignoring error as it usually means flag wasn't set: flag accessed but not defined: context
[odo] I0625 16:22:22.018170   23031 context.go:355] Ignoring error as it usually means flag wasn't set: flag accessed but not defined: context
[odo] I0625 16:22:22.018217   23031 context.go:355] Ignoring error as it usually means flag wasn't set: flag accessed but not defined: app
[odo] I0625 16:22:22.018225   23031 context.go:355] Ignoring error as it usually means flag wasn't set: flag accessed but not defined: project
[odo] I0625 16:22:22.019737   23031 context.go:355] Ignoring error as it usually means flag wasn't set: flag accessed but not defined: app
[odo] I0625 16:22:22.019771   23031 context.go:355] Ignoring error as it usually means flag wasn't set: flag accessed but not defined: output
[odo] I0625 16:22:22.019777   23031 context.go:355] Ignoring error as it usually means flag wasn't set: flag accessed but not defined: component
[odo]  •  Waiting for project to come up  ...
[odo] I0625 16:22:22.022147   23031 cmdutils.go:26] Error:
[odo] unable to create new project: unable to create new project opwzmapaux: projectrequests.project.openshift.io is forbidden: User "system:serviceaccount:ci-op-n5np26ny:default" cannot create projectrequests.project.openshift.io at the cluster scope: no RBAC policy matched
[odo]  ✗  projectrequests.project.openshift.io is forbidden: User "system:serviceaccount:ci-op-n5np26ny:default" cannot create

/test integration

Copy link
Contributor

@surajnarwade surajnarwade left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: surajnarwade

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. Required by Prow. label Jun 26, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@mik-dass mik-dass left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. Required by Prow. label Jun 26, 2019
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 5d96478 into redhat-developer:master Jun 26, 2019
@rm3l rm3l added the estimated-size/M (10-20) Rough sizing for Epics. About 1 sprint of work for one person label Jun 18, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. Required by Prow. estimated-size/M (10-20) Rough sizing for Epics. About 1 sprint of work for one person lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. Required by Prow.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants