enterprise contract update#4707
Conversation
|
/lgtm |
070f3c7 to
6922955
Compare
|
/lgtm |
|
The Task bundle will upgrade the version of EC that might cause an outage, so let's not merge this until we have a fix for it. |
6922955 to
648a7f7
Compare
Signed-off-by: Luiz Carvalho <lucarval@redhat.com>
648a7f7 to
9ea2237
Compare
|
Removed the problematic parts. Moving it out of draft so we can get a hotfix in for ec-policies. |
|
/lgtm |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: ec-automation[bot], zregvart The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/lgtm |
|
Things are broken: |
I'm wondering if this is the caching issue. There's multiple directories after policy |
|
Looks exactly like the issue we did the rollback for in konflux-ci/build-definitions#1510, not sure how is that still present here without the EC CLI update |
|
It looks like the errors I found were from a previous run. The IDs in the URLs are different. It looks like it failed due to some sort of infra issue |
|
/retest-required |
Shows unexpected version of EC (for me), it is too new, and contains the issue we rolled back the update in build definitions for. |
🤞 |
|
/lgtm |
|
/retest-required |
|
@ec-automation[bot]: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
/lgtm |
No description provided.