-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 246
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: update statement column lineage (#487) #524
Conversation
235549f
to
e9f05e5
Compare
e9f05e5
to
2ec1af2
Compare
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #524 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 99.49% 99.49%
=======================================
Files 41 41
Lines 2185 2191 +6
=======================================
+ Hits 2174 2180 +6
Misses 11 11 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
I would like to ask for advice on how to solve codecov check failed? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For update statement, we don't have to duplicate a lot of methods in SelectExtractor, it's more like merge statement. Please refer to MergeExtractor.
db7911d
to
aeeda08
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Made some change to further simplify the logic. Now it's ready to be merged. Thanks for your contribution.
Closes #487