Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a version selector dropdown to the main menu #438

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

agjohnson
Copy link
Collaborator

@agjohnson agjohnson commented Jun 29, 2017

This adds a version selection dropdown to the menu. It is used to redirect on
change to the version URL. The versions theme option is added and is used to
add a mapping of version slugs to URLs.

Currently, this is going to be used in pydoc.io. The implementation will change
the javascript slightly, to accept json data instead of a blob of HTML.

This will currently be disabled on Read the Docs, as we are rethinking what the
version selection menu looks like.
version-select

This adds a version selection dropdown to the menu. It is used to redirect on
change to the version URL. The ``versions`` theme option is added and is used to
add a mapping of version slugs to URLs.

Currently, this is going to be used in pydoc.io. The implementation will change
the javascript slightly, to accept json data instead of a blob of HTML.

This will currently be disabled on Read the Docs, as we are rethinking what the
version selection menu looks like.
@agjohnson agjohnson added the PR: work in progress Pull request is not ready for full review label Jun 29, 2017
@agjohnson agjohnson requested review from Blendify and ericholscher and removed request for Blendify June 29, 2017 21:01
@Blendify
Copy link
Member

For simplicity can we get rid of the unrelated changes? Opening these as separate PRs if necessary. All in all, I can see this being helpful rather than leaving it up to users to write there own. But maybe instead of putting it in the wy-side-nav-search maybe it should go into rst-versions?

Copy link
Member

@ericholscher ericholscher left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@ericholscher
Copy link
Member

@Blendify can you clarify the But maybe instead of putting it in the wy-side-nav-search maybe it should go into rst-versions? part of your comment?

@ericholscher
Copy link
Member

Oh, I see -- it's in that block in the sidebar. +1 on adding it outside of the search div.

@agjohnson
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This isn't a problem of the version selector being placed in the wrong element, but the element was poorly named initially. .wy-side-nav-search contains not just the search, but the logo, project name, and version. So -1 from me on changing this here, I think it's out of scope for this feature.

@Blendify
Copy link
Member

For myself, I prefer it down there. This is where we wrote our custom version switch for my other project.

@Blendify
Copy link
Member

This isn't a problem of the version selector being placed in the wrong element, but the element was poorly named initially. .wy-side-nav-search contains not just the search, but the logo, project name, and version. So -1 from me on changing this here, I think it's out of scope for this feature.

The feature itself is fine and we should merge this. Although I think after we merge this we need to make a final decision on how this will work on readthedocs and where in the html template it should go. We should also add support for a language drop down. Also it seems you ran grunt before committing to the branch so those changes need to be reverted before merging.

@Blendify Blendify added this to the v0.2.6 milestone Jul 30, 2017
@iMattPro
Copy link

Yes please 👍

@Blendify
Copy link
Member

Ok, so they are getting back from a month or so of vacation but after other important task get done we can have a look at this.

@baylessj
Copy link

baylessj commented Jan 8, 2018

Just dropped these changes into some docs that I'm building locally, and I'm running into a few issues. They are likely due to me not configuring my project correctly, but I'm not really sure how this is supposed to work after reading this thread and the changes to the docs. For reference, I am used to using Sphinx-Versioning (https://robpol86.github.io/sphinxcontrib-versioning/index.html) to achieve this same goal.

In Sphinx-Versioning, each version is a completely separate project, with separate conf.py files and such. Is the intent to do the same with this feature, where each project has the same versions dictionary and then routes to the other's url? That seems to be a proper way of handling it, with the exception of building docs locally. If there was any way to specify relative links instead of urls for the versions that would make it much easier to test.

Additionally, the dropdown box looks much different and generic compared to the example in the original post here. Granted, I have modified a decent bit of the theme's color scheme so that's a very likely source of the disparity, but I have not touched any other parameters or characteristics of the theme besides the colors. Any ideas as to what could cause the differences, or is it more than likely due to my own meddling? A picture for reference:
differentdropdownappearance

@agjohnson
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I'd like to rethink how this could be used for RTD. We have some thoughts on what a new menu is going to be like, but i do like having an additional pattern like this for switching versions on RTD.

Eventually, the menu is going to at least be API driven and not just a blob of HTML handed out by RTD.

@billsacks
Copy link

I'm curious if there are any plans for this or similar functionality to be merged to the master version of this theme. I'm maintaining a few projects where we are hosting our documentation on github.io (rather than readthedocs), but want versioning functionality. We are currently using this branch to do so, and I'm wondering if that is what we'll need to do long-term, or if there is some hope that we'll be able to use master for this functionality at some point.

billsacks added a commit to ESMCI/cime that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2020
Documentation: provide a version dropdown menu and change theme

The documentation of cime is starting to diverge on the various
important branches (master, maint-5.6, and ufs_release_v1.0). This PR,
along with similar PRs for maint-5.6 and ufs_release_v1.0, and some
changes to the gh-pages branch, support having versioned documentation,
with a dropdown menu. This also changes the documentation theme to a
theme that supports this version dropdown. Note that this requires a
branch of the sphinx_rtd_theme; I will update the cime wiki on building
the documentation to note the new pip install step needed for that. (See
below for more details.)

At a high level, the way the versioned documentation works is to have
separate subdirectories in the gh-pages branch for each version of the
documentation we want to support. There is then a bit of JavaScript code
which uses a json file in the gh-pages branch to determine which
versions exist and how these should be named in the dropdown menu. This
changes the documentation build process slightly; I will update the wiki
to reflect these changes.

@mvertens and I made the various changes that you can see in
`doc/source` in this PR, which mainly borrowed from
ESCOMP/CISM-wrapper#23. That, in turn, is a
slight modification of an implementation provided by @MNLevy for the
MARBL documentation, which in turn borrowed from an implementation put
together by Unidata (credit where credit is due).

As mentioned above, I am not aware of out-of-the-box support for a
version pull-down in out-of-the-box sphinx themes (though the last time
I looked was in Fall, 2018, so there may be something available
now). However, support for a version dropdown exists in an open PR in
the sphinx readthedocs theme repository:
readthedocs/sphinx_rtd_theme#438. I have pushed
this branch to a new repository in ESMCI
(https://github.com/ESMCI/sphinx_rtd_theme) to facilitate long-term
maintenance of this branch in case it disappears from the official
sphinx_rtd_theme repository. I have also cherry-picked a commit onto
that branch, which is needed to fix search functionality in sphinx1.8
(from readthedocs/sphinx_rtd_theme#672) (which
is another reason for maintaining our own copy of this branch). The
branch in this repository is now named version-dropdown-with-fixes
(branching off of the version-dropdown branch in the sphinx_rtd_theme
repository). I will update the wiki to give the additional pip install
command needed to install this repository before doing the build. In the
long-term, I am a little concerned about using this theme that isn't
showing any signs of being merged to the main branch of the readthedocs
theme, but this has been working for us in other projects for the last 2
years, so I feel this is a reasonable approach in the short-medium term.

A few changes were also needed in the gh-pages branch:

- A `versions` directory was introduced at the top level, with
  subdirectories for each documentation version we want to support. We
  are using the convention that these subdirectories should have names
  that match the corresponding cime branches, to avoid uncertainty.

- A top-level index.html page was introduced that redirects to the
  master version of the documentation:

```html
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="refresh" content="0; url=versions/master/html/index.html" />
  </head>
</html>
```

- Other than those files and an empty `.nojekyll` file, everything else
  was removed from the top level directory of the documentation.

- In the versions directory, we also introduced a `versions.json`
  file. This lists the versions and provides a mapping between directory
  names and the names used in the pull-down menu:

```json
{
    "master": "master",
    "maint-5.6": "cime5.6",
    "ufs_release_v1.0": "ufs_release_v1.0"
}
```

- The complete contents of each version subdirectory are generated by
  the documentation build script. Thus, it is safe to remove the
  contents of (e.g.) `versions/master/` before rebuilding the
  documentation for that version. The documentation build is done
  similarly to before, but now providing a BUILDDIR argument to the make
  command in order to build in the correct subdirectory. For example,
  when building the documentation for master, you would provide
  `BUILDDIR=/path/to/cime_gh_pages_repo/versions/master/`.

Test suite: none
Test baseline: n/a
Test namelist changes: none
Test status: bit for bit

Fixes none

User interface changes?: none

Update gh-pages html (Y/N)?: Y (already done)

Code review:
billsacks added a commit to ESCOMP/CTSM that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2020
Bring documentation source to master

1. Bring documentation source to master: Pulls in the source from
   https://github.com/escomp/ctsm-docs. This is important so that
   documentation can remain in sync with changes in the model
   code. Images are stored here using git-lfs (Git Large File
   Storage). I also made some minor fixes to get the pdf build of the
   tech note working.

2. Use a different documentation theme that supports a version dropdown
   menu, and add the code needed to support this versioning on the
   documentation web pages. At a high level, the way the versioned
   documentation works is to have separate subdirectories in the
   gh-pages branch of the ctsm-docs repository for each version of the
   documentation we want to support. There is then a bit of JavaScript
   code which uses a json file in the gh-pages branch to determine which
   versions exist and how these should be named in the dropdown
   menu. Most of these changes were borrowed from ESMCI/cime#3439, which
   in turn borrowed from ESCOMP/CISM-wrapper#23, which in turn was a
   slight modification of an implementation provided by @mnlevy1981 for
   the MARBL documentation, which in turn borrowed from an
   implementation put together by Unidata (credit where credit is due).

   I am not aware of out-of-the-box support for a version pull-down in
   out-of-the-box sphinx themes (though the last time I looked was in
   Fall, 2018, so there may be something available now). However,
   support for a version dropdown exists in an open PR in the sphinx
   readthedocs theme repository: readthedocs/sphinx_rtd_theme#438. I
   have pushed this branch to a new repository in ESMCI
   (https://github.com/ESMCI/sphinx_rtd_theme) to facilitate long-term
   maintenance of this branch in case it disappears from the official
   sphinx_rtd_theme repository. I have also cherry-picked a commit onto
   that branch, which is needed to fix search functionality in sphinx1.8
   (from readthedocs/sphinx_rtd_theme#672) (which is another reason for
   maintaining our own copy of this branch). The branch in this
   repository is now named version-dropdown-with-fixes (branching off of
   the version-dropdown branch in the sphinx_rtd_theme repository). In
   the long-term, I am a little concerned about using this theme that
   isn't showing any signs of being merged to the main branch of the
   readthedocs theme, but this has been working for us in other projects
   for the last 2 years, so I feel this is a reasonable approach in the
   short-medium term.

The new process for building the documentation is given here:
https://github.com/ESCOMP/CTSM/wiki/Directions-for-editing-CLM-documentation-on-github-and-sphinx

Resolves #239
ekluzek added a commit to ekluzek/CTSM that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2020
Bring documentation source to master

1. Bring documentation source to master: Pulls in the source from
   https://github.com/escomp/ctsm-docs. This is important so that
   documentation can remain in sync with changes in the model
   code. Images are stored here using git-lfs (Git Large File
   Storage). I also made some minor fixes to get the pdf build of the
   tech note working.

2. Use a different documentation theme that supports a version dropdown
   menu, and add the code needed to support this versioning on the
   documentation web pages. At a high level, the way the versioned
   documentation works is to have separate subdirectories in the
   gh-pages branch of the ctsm-docs repository for each version of the
   documentation we want to support. There is then a bit of JavaScript
   code which uses a json file in the gh-pages branch to determine which
   versions exist and how these should be named in the dropdown
   menu. Most of these changes were borrowed from ESMCI/cime#3439, which
   in turn borrowed from ESCOMP/CISM-wrapper#23, which in turn was a
   slight modification of an implementation provided by @mnlevy1981 for
   the MARBL documentation, which in turn borrowed from an
   implementation put together by Unidata (credit where credit is due).

   I am not aware of out-of-the-box support for a version pull-down in
   out-of-the-box sphinx themes (though the last time I looked was in
   Fall, 2018, so there may be something available now). However,
   support for a version dropdown exists in an open PR in the sphinx
   readthedocs theme repository: readthedocs/sphinx_rtd_theme#438. I
   have pushed this branch to a new repository in ESMCI
   (https://github.com/ESMCI/sphinx_rtd_theme) to facilitate long-term
   maintenance of this branch in case it disappears from the official
   sphinx_rtd_theme repository. I have also cherry-picked a commit onto
   that branch, which is needed to fix search functionality in sphinx1.8
   (from readthedocs/sphinx_rtd_theme#672) (which is another reason for
   maintaining our own copy of this branch). The branch in this
   repository is now named version-dropdown-with-fixes (branching off of
   the version-dropdown branch in the sphinx_rtd_theme repository). In
   the long-term, I am a little concerned about using this theme that
   isn't showing any signs of being merged to the main branch of the
   readthedocs theme, but this has been working for us in other projects
   for the last 2 years, so I feel this is a reasonable approach in the
   short-medium term.

The new process for building the documentation is given here:
https://github.com/ESCOMP/CTSM/wiki/Directions-for-editing-CLM-documentation-on-github-and-sphinx

Resolves ESCOMP#239
ekluzek added a commit to ekluzek/CTSM that referenced this pull request Apr 20, 2020
Bring documentation source to master

1. Bring documentation source to master: Pulls in the source from
   https://github.com/escomp/ctsm-docs. This is important so that
   documentation can remain in sync with changes in the model
   code. Images are stored here using git-lfs (Git Large File
   Storage). I also made some minor fixes to get the pdf build of the
   tech note working.

2. Use a different documentation theme that supports a version dropdown
   menu, and add the code needed to support this versioning on the
   documentation web pages. At a high level, the way the versioned
   documentation works is to have separate subdirectories in the
   gh-pages branch of the ctsm-docs repository for each version of the
   documentation we want to support. There is then a bit of JavaScript
   code which uses a json file in the gh-pages branch to determine which
   versions exist and how these should be named in the dropdown
   menu. Most of these changes were borrowed from ESMCI/cime#3439, which
   in turn borrowed from ESCOMP/CISM-wrapper#23, which in turn was a
   slight modification of an implementation provided by @mnlevy1981 for
   the MARBL documentation, which in turn borrowed from an
   implementation put together by Unidata (credit where credit is due).

   I am not aware of out-of-the-box support for a version pull-down in
   out-of-the-box sphinx themes (though the last time I looked was in
   Fall, 2018, so there may be something available now). However,
   support for a version dropdown exists in an open PR in the sphinx
   readthedocs theme repository: readthedocs/sphinx_rtd_theme#438. I
   have pushed this branch to a new repository in ESMCI
   (https://github.com/ESMCI/sphinx_rtd_theme) to facilitate long-term
   maintenance of this branch in case it disappears from the official
   sphinx_rtd_theme repository. I have also cherry-picked a commit onto
   that branch, which is needed to fix search functionality in sphinx1.8
   (from readthedocs/sphinx_rtd_theme#672) (which is another reason for
   maintaining our own copy of this branch). The branch in this
   repository is now named version-dropdown-with-fixes (branching off of
   the version-dropdown branch in the sphinx_rtd_theme repository). In
   the long-term, I am a little concerned about using this theme that
   isn't showing any signs of being merged to the main branch of the
   readthedocs theme, but this has been working for us in other projects
   for the last 2 years, so I feel this is a reasonable approach in the
   short-medium term.

The new process for building the documentation is given here:
https://github.com/ESCOMP/CTSM/wiki/Directions-for-editing-CLM-documentation-on-github-and-sphinx

Resolves ESCOMP#239
jtruesdal added a commit to jtruesdal/ctsm that referenced this pull request May 1, 2020
Bring documentation source to master

1. Bring documentation source to master: Pulls in the source from
   https://github.com/escomp/ctsm-docs. This is important so that
   documentation can remain in sync with changes in the model
   code. Images are stored here using git-lfs (Git Large File
   Storage). I also made some minor fixes to get the pdf build of the
   tech note working.

2. Use a different documentation theme that supports a version dropdown
   menu, and add the code needed to support this versioning on the
   documentation web pages. At a high level, the way the versioned
   documentation works is to have separate subdirectories in the
   gh-pages branch of the ctsm-docs repository for each version of the
   documentation we want to support. There is then a bit of JavaScript
   code which uses a json file in the gh-pages branch to determine which
   versions exist and how these should be named in the dropdown
   menu. Most of these changes were borrowed from ESMCI/cime#3439, which
   in turn borrowed from ESCOMP/CISM-wrapper#23, which in turn was a
   slight modification of an implementation provided by @mnlevy1981 for
   the MARBL documentation, which in turn borrowed from an
   implementation put together by Unidata (credit where credit is due).

   I am not aware of out-of-the-box support for a version pull-down in
   out-of-the-box sphinx themes (though the last time I looked was in
   Fall, 2018, so there may be something available now). However,
   support for a version dropdown exists in an open PR in the sphinx
   readthedocs theme repository: readthedocs/sphinx_rtd_theme#438. I
   have pushed this branch to a new repository in ESMCI
   (https://github.com/ESMCI/sphinx_rtd_theme) to facilitate long-term
   maintenance of this branch in case it disappears from the official
   sphinx_rtd_theme repository. I have also cherry-picked a commit onto
   that branch, which is needed to fix search functionality in sphinx1.8
   (from readthedocs/sphinx_rtd_theme#672) (which is another reason for
   maintaining our own copy of this branch). The branch in this
   repository is now named version-dropdown-with-fixes (branching off of
   the version-dropdown branch in the sphinx_rtd_theme repository). In
   the long-term, I am a little concerned about using this theme that
   isn't showing any signs of being merged to the main branch of the
   readthedocs theme, but this has been working for us in other projects
   for the last 2 years, so I feel this is a reasonable approach in the
   short-medium term.

The new process for building the documentation is given here:
https://github.com/ESCOMP/CTSM/wiki/Directions-for-editing-CLM-documentation-on-github-and-sphinx

Resolves ESCOMP#239
@agjohnson
Copy link
Collaborator Author

No, I don't think this feature will be merged as-is. The problem with this approach so far is that this is a build-time only feature, meaning as soon as the version list is updated, this menu is inaccurate. We don't want to continue adding features like this, however our API is not where it needs to be to support a feature like this.

I'm going to close this for now.

@agjohnson agjohnson closed this May 3, 2020
@billsacks
Copy link

@agjohnson thanks for your reply - and thank you for all of your work on this project.

FYI, and in case it happens to be useful to you: We use this version of the theme with a bit of added JavaScript code that sets the versions dynamically. To add a version, the only thing needed is to add a line to a json file in the build directory – no rebuild is needed. For details of what we do, see ESMCI/cime#3439 - both the files changed and the initial comment in the PR. (The json file I'm referring to looks like this: https://github.com/ESMCI/cime/blob/f8dba01bbdfbf0c86e132be08490ae001815c64d/versions/versions.json .) (I'll be honest, though: I am far from an expert in web development and don't totally understand how this works: I inherited it from others.)

I'll also note, in case it's useful to others, that we're maintaining this branch in a fork (https://github.com/ESMCI/sphinx_rtd_theme/tree/version-dropdown-with-fixes), so that we can cherry-pick any critical bug fixes into this branch (currently just ESMCI@05a46f5).

@stsewd stsewd deleted the version-dropdown branch December 3, 2020 23:53
humitos added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2024
humitos added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2024
humitos added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 20, 2024
* Show version/language selectors below the title

* Use CSS styles from old attempt

#438

* Update CSS to apply to both selectors

* Prepend the current version if it's hidden

* Split it into two different configs

* Use correct value for language

* Make the selectors more prominent

* Typo fix on comment

* Update CSS

* Update JavaScript

* Always include the version javascript

* Only include the languages if there is one

* Change `display_version` default

* HTML layout rework

* Update docs

* HTML layout fix

* Docs typo

* Update CSS

* Updates from review

* re-compile CSS

* Update CSS

* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Eric Holscher <[email protected]>

* Use the prettier to lint the file

* Whitespaces

* Update event listener

* Update CSS

* Update CSS

* Remove language switch if there are not translations

* Tune version and language selector styles (#1603)

* Tuning on select width and icon placement

* Use better cursor

* Add a max width to selects so that they can't overflow

* Only add after pseudo element if select exists

* Lint

* Debug: trigger Read the Docs Addons event to test/debug locally (#1606)

* Debug: trigger Read the Docs Addons event to test/debug locally

Closes #1605

* Push missing file

---------

Co-authored-by: Eric Holscher <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Anthony <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
PR: work in progress Pull request is not ready for full review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants