Add more details to compiler debugging section #6896
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
poteto
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 21, 2024
Upstreams some information from reactwg/react-compiler#7 since things like the temporary "use no memo" directive were not documented here ghstack-source-id: a02d138647da465b352c39612cce59778011652c Pull Request resolved: #6896
poteto
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 21, 2024
Upstreams some information from reactwg/react-compiler#7 since things like the temporary "use no memo" directive were not documented here ghstack-source-id: 5ce9bce8aee76134ed98b47d5c0d147f4c934ab2 Pull Request resolved: #6896
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):
Upstreams some information from
reactwg/react-compiler#7 since things
like the temporary "use no memo" directive were not documented here