-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[rcore] InitWindow()
should check InitPlatform()
returned value
#4164
Closed
SuperUserNameMan
wants to merge
4
commits into
raysan5:master
from
SuperUserNameMan:2024-07-15-InitWindow-check-InitPlatform-return
Closed
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e87965e
`rcore_template.c` : `InitPlatform()` return `-1` not `false`
SuperUserNameMan 276a74b
`rcore.c` : `InitWindow()` check `InitPlatform()` success.
SuperUserNameMan 0ae7b0f
Update rcore.c
SuperUserNameMan f0b569a
Update rcore.c
SuperUserNameMan File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -631,7 +631,12 @@ void InitWindow(int width, int height, const char *title) | |
|
||
// Initialize platform | ||
//-------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
InitPlatform(); | ||
if ( InitPlatform() != 0 ) | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I try to avoid this kind of structure on raylib, also, not following conventions, raylib does not place spaces between parenthesis. In any case it should be: int result = InitPlatform();
if (result == -1) // Platform initialization failed
{
TRACELOG(LOG_WARNING, "WINDOW: Platform initialization failed");
//CORE.Window.ready = false; // If platform has not been correctly initialized, this should be already "false"
return; // In araylib I try to avoid/minimize early returns
} |
||
{ | ||
TRACELOG(LOG_ERROR, "Platform backend: Window initialization failed."); | ||
CORE.Window.ready = false; | ||
return; | ||
} | ||
//-------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
|
||
// Initialize rlgl default data (buffers and shaders) | ||
|
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually, afaik, there is no clear convention defined on the function return values when used for errors detection... I tried to avoid that approach for raylib but I can consider it...