Skip to content

Conversation

@jianoaix
Copy link
Contributor

@jianoaix jianoaix commented Feb 22, 2023

Why are these changes needed?

  • Due to the .dataset_format() is hardcoded to default in streaming, the numpy is treated as a block type which is not supported
  • Issues caused by the partial execution of ds.take() in bulk execution (v.s. in streaming this is not handled by LazyBlocklist)
  • Issues of object ownership handling due to incorrect resolution when converting bundle to blocklist

#32132

Related issue number

Checks

  • I've signed off every commit(by using the -s flag, i.e., git commit -s) in this PR.
  • I've run scripts/format.sh to lint the changes in this PR.
  • I've included any doc changes needed for https://docs.ray.io/en/master/.
  • I've made sure the tests are passing. Note that there might be a few flaky tests, see the recent failures at https://flakey-tests.ray.io/
  • Testing Strategy
    • Unit tests
    • Release tests
    • This PR is not tested :(

if ray.data.context.DatasetContext.get_current().use_streaming_executor:
# In streaming execution of ds.iter_batches(), there is no partial
# execution so _num_computed() in LazyBlocklist is 0.
assert ds._plan.execute()._num_computed() == 0
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is basically disabling this test. How about we just force it to use bulk executor instead?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This assertion still has value as it checks that streaming execution didn't run LazyBlocklist.

@ericl ericl added the @author-action-required The PR author is responsible for the next step. Remove tag to send back to the reviewer. label Feb 23, 2023
@ericl ericl merged commit 4c6d75b into ray-project:master Feb 23, 2023
@jianoaix jianoaix removed the @author-action-required The PR author is responsible for the next step. Remove tag to send back to the reviewer. label Feb 23, 2023
edoakes pushed a commit to edoakes/ray that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2023
peytondmurray pushed a commit to peytondmurray/ray that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2023
elliottower pushed a commit to elliottower/ray that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants