Use Ubuntu 24.04 in CI workflows.

[bdice]

This PR replaces ubuntu22.04 with ubuntu24.04. This allows us to continue testing endpoints of our support matrix (we still support Ubuntu 20.04). The CI matrix has been reduced enough that I do not see a significant value proposition to keep any jobs with Ubuntu 22.04. It seems more valuable to have extensive testing of Ubuntu 24.04.

Depends on rapidsai/ci-imgs#195.

Contributes to rapidsai/build-planning#74.

[jameslamb]

Thanks for getting this started. I left one suggestion for your consideration.

[bdice]

Some notes:

• I realized we can't use Ubuntu 24.04 in workflows with CUDA versions older than 12.5.1 because no nvidia/cuda images exist (we already excluded those in the ci-imgs matrix, I just hadn't considered the downstream effects).
  • I migrated the affected test jobs to Ubuntu 22.04.
• We should do our conda builds (C++ and Python) on Rocky Linux 8 because it's safer and better supported.
  • Rocky Linux 8 has the oldest glibc we support, which makes builds safer.
  • This will align with conda-forge as they migrate to glibc 2.28.
  • This also aligns RAPIDS conda builds with RAPIDS wheel builds, which already use Rocky Linux 8.
  • I think we have an old issue or thread about this somewhere -- we have meant to do switch conda builds to the oldest supported glibc in the past.

[bdice]

CI testing is complete! Here is the link: rapidsai/build-planning#74 (comment)

Are there any other repositories we should test? I think I got sufficient coverage here, and am happy to help iron out any additional issues that arise after merging.

[bdice]

For future record, there were a couple of minor hiccups:

• cudf: missing timezone data needed by ORC sample data files, solved by installing tzdata-legacy into the CI image.
  • Add tzdata-legacy to Ubuntu 24.04 images ci-imgs#199
  • Example files are using legacy timezone names (US/Pacific) apache/orc#2049
• raft/cuvs: issues with divide-by-zero in awk, solved by using a Python one-liner instead
  • Test Ubuntu 24.04 in CI workflows. cuvs#414 (comment)
  • rapidsai/cuvs@94ff443
  • rapidsai/raft@d3b34c9

[jameslamb]

Thanks! I'm happy with the matrix changes (they look identical to what I'd previously reviewed) and with the extent of the testing that was done.

I support merging this as-is, will defer to your judgment on the timing.

[bdice]

I'm going to merge. If any issues arise, we have plenty of time to fix them before burndown or code freeze for 24.12.