Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix spill-to-disk triggered by Dask explicitly #800

Merged

Conversation

madsbk
Copy link
Member

@madsbk madsbk commented Nov 22, 2021

The evict didn't use the buffer_info introduced in #779 and the test didn't capture the failure. This PR fixes both issues.

Notice, I think this is small and important enough to go into the v21.12 release.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the python python code needed label Nov 22, 2021
@madsbk madsbk added 2 - In Progress Currently a work in progress improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change labels Nov 22, 2021
@madsbk madsbk changed the title Fix spill-to-disk for forced by Dask explicitly Fix spill-to-disk forced by Dask explicitly Nov 22, 2021
@madsbk madsbk changed the title Fix spill-to-disk forced by Dask explicitly Fix spill-to-disk triggered by Dask explicitly Nov 22, 2021
@pentschev
Copy link
Member

rerun tests

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Nov 22, 2021

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (branch-21.12@3cc4670). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##             branch-21.12     #800   +/-   ##
===============================================
  Coverage                ?   90.26%           
===============================================
  Files                   ?       15           
  Lines                   ?     1992           
  Branches                ?        0           
===============================================
  Hits                    ?     1798           
  Misses                  ?      194           
  Partials                ?        0           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3cc4670...3dc6aab. Read the comment docs.

@madsbk madsbk marked this pull request as ready for review November 22, 2021 12:25
@madsbk madsbk requested a review from a team as a code owner November 22, 2021 12:25
@madsbk madsbk added 3 - Ready for Review Ready for review by team and removed 2 - In Progress Currently a work in progress labels Nov 22, 2021
Copy link
Member

@pentschev pentschev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks for this fix @madsbk !

@pentschev
Copy link
Member

@gpucibot merge

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit cb13219 into rapidsai:branch-21.12 Nov 22, 2021
@madsbk madsbk deleted the test_worker_force_spill_to_disk branch November 22, 2021 14:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3 - Ready for Review Ready for review by team improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change python python code needed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants