Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove 'tomli' dependency #1338

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 7, 2024
Merged

Conversation

jameslamb
Copy link
Member

@jameslamb jameslamb commented May 6, 2024

Proposes removing this project's build-time dependency on tomli.

It appears to no longer be necessary.

git grep tomli

Notes for Reviewers

I originally noticed something similar in ucx-py (rapidsai/ucx-py#1042), then went searching for similar cases across RAPIDS.

I'm not sure why this project has a dependency on tomli, but I suspect it was related to the use of versioneer in this project's history. Reference: python-versioneer/python-versioneer#338 (comment)

This project doesn't use versioneer any more (#1204). I strongly suspect that the dependency on tomli can be removed.

@jameslamb jameslamb added improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change labels May 6, 2024
@jameslamb jameslamb requested a review from a team as a code owner May 6, 2024 17:13
@github-actions github-actions bot added the conda conda issue label May 6, 2024
@jameslamb jameslamb requested a review from pentschev May 6, 2024 18:46
@jakirkham
Copy link
Member

/merge

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit ef83eb4 into rapidsai:branch-24.06 May 7, 2024
27 checks passed
@jakirkham
Copy link
Member

Thanks all! 🙏

@jameslamb jameslamb deleted the remove-tomli branch May 7, 2024 17:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
conda conda issue improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants