Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Region Properties Performance Overhaul - Part 3: Convex Image Properties #845

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: branch-25.04
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

grlee77
Copy link
Contributor

@grlee77 grlee77 commented Mar 3, 2025

Please review #843 first as that explains the general approach in more detail.

Overview

This MR implements the following properties based on first computing a convex object for each region.

  • area_convex
  • solidity
  • feret_diameter_max

Benchmarks

Note that unlike in Part1 and Part2, computing the convex hull image via convex_hull_image introduced in #828, can only operate on a single labeled region at a time. Thus, these properties are expected to show good acceleration in the case of relatively few, larger labeled regions but will become slow when there are a very large number of small regions.

Performance vs. Image Size (with # regions fixed)

The following show performance for a small fixed number of label regions at different spatial scale in both 2D and 3D

In 2D, there are 16 labeled regions for shapes ranging from (64, 64) up to (8192, 8192)
regionprops_convex_vs_size

In 3D, there are 8 labeled regions for shapes ranging from (32, 32) up to (512, 512, 512)
regionprops_3d_convex_vs_size

Note that scikit-image results were not computed at larger 3D size due to excessive computation time

Performance vs. Region Size (with image shape fixed)

Here a single large 2D image (7680, 4320) is used, but with varying numbers of labeled regions within it. The total % of foreground vs. background voxels remains similar (i.e. regions are larger when there are fewer of them). The number of regions range from 4 up through 16,384.
regionprops_convex_vs_object_size

Due to very slow performance of scikit-image's convex hull on large 3D regions, no comparison is shown here for that case.

Benchmark conclusions

We can see that there is substantial acceleration across image sizes when the number of labeled regions is small (top 2 plots). However, because we have to launch the hybrid convex hull computation for each region in isolation, performance suffers at fixed image size as the individual labeled regions become smaller and smaller. For the case with thousands of labeled regions performance can even become slower than on the CPU.

The functions introduced here are not being added to the public API. They will
be used behind the scenes from `regionprops_table` to enable orders of magnitude
faster computation of region properties for all labels in an image. The basic
approach here is to compute a property for all labels in an image from a single
CUDA kernel call. This is in contrast to the approach from the `RegionProperties`
class which first splits the full image into small sub-images corresponding to
each region and then loops over these small sub-images, computing the requested
property for each small region in turn. That approach is not amenable to good
acceleration on the GPU as individual regions are typically small.

Provides batch implementation that computes the following properties for all properties
in a single kernel call:

- bbox
- label_filled (creates version of label_image with all holes filled)
- num_pixels
- num_pixels_filled
- num_perimeter_pixels (number of pixels at perimeter of each labeled region)
- num_boundary_pixels (number of pixels touching the image boundary for each region)

The following properties are simple transformations of the properties above and
have negligable additional cost to compute:

- area
- area_bbox
- area_filled
- equivalent_diameter_area
- equivalent_spherical_perimeter (as in ITK)
- extent
- perimeter_on_border_ratio (as in ITK)
- slice

The following split the label image into a list of sub-images or subsets of coordinates
where each element in the list corresponds to a label. The background of the label image
has value 0 and is not represented in the sequences. Sequence entry `i` corresponds to
label `i + 1`. In most cases, these will not be needed as properties are now computed
for all regions at once from the labels image, but they are provided for completeness
and to match the scikit-image API.

- coords
- coords_scaled
- image (label mask subimages)
- image_convex (convex label mask subimages)
- image_intensity (intensity_image subimages)
- image_filled (subimages of label mask but with holes filled)
- label (sequence of integer label ids)

Test cases are added that compare the results of these batch computations to results
from scikit-image `regionprops_table`.
This function operates similarly to `regionprops_table`. In a future commit,
once all properties have been supported, it will be used within the existing
regionprops_table function so that it will provide much higher performance.
- intensity_mean
- intensity_std
- intensity_min
- intensity_max

Both single and multi-channel intensity images are supported
These properties are computed based on the image_convex subimages:

- area_convex
- feret_diameter_max
- solidity
@grlee77 grlee77 added improvement Improves an existing functionality non-breaking Introduces a non-breaking change performance Performance improvement labels Mar 3, 2025
@grlee77 grlee77 added this to the v25.04.00 milestone Mar 3, 2025
@grlee77 grlee77 requested review from a team as code owners March 3, 2025 14:59
@grlee77 grlee77 requested a review from msarahan March 3, 2025 14:59
@grlee77 grlee77 changed the title Region Properties Performance Overhaul - Part3: Convex Image Properties Region Properties Performance Overhaul - Part 3: Convex Image Properties Mar 7, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
improvement Improves an existing functionality non-breaking Introduces a non-breaking change performance Performance improvement
Projects
Status: No status
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant