On-site feedback (2022-02) #156
Labels
bug
Fake news or not working code.
help-wanted
Help especially wanted.
suggested-via-site
Feedback given directly on the site.
Maybe mention from/into/try_into in this section or at least link to a section with those here.They are not mentioned because the "upper" sections are only language (in contrast to API) related, the section Type Conversions lists all of them and more. Added a link.The S where u8: R example could use some explanation what u8: R means, does it mean u8 needs to implement a trait R with a parameter T?Yes, it does mean that. I'm happy to clarify the samples but they still have to fit a single line each. PR proposals welcome.It might be useful to list the operators anyway along with the traits used to implement them.Yes, see Bit wise operations missing? #151!It might make sense to have a section with the operators as well as the checked, saturating and wrapped versions of the operations.Similar to above; although I'm not sure how the checked, ... would differ explanation-wise. I mean, yes, they obviously differ, but IMO the name already explains exactly what happens linguistically. If someone has a specific idea feel free to post here or in Bit wise operations missing? #151.It might be useful to mention some or all of rust-toolchain.toml, deny.toml (from cargo-deny), tarpaulin.toml (from cargo-tarpaulin) in this list tooAfter some back and forth I don't want to document 3rd party tools anymore since it gets out of hand. That said,rust-toolchain.toml
is a good idea!Maybe in this section function pointer (lower case fn) types should also be mentioned?Hm, function pointers might deserve a bit more treatment (esp. their "type-iness" w.r.t.for<'a>
), but I think that's unrelated to that section, which is about the "inheritance" / design-trade-off between the different traits.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: