Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Retrieve session without any implicit ordering #99

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Retrieve session without any implicit ordering #99

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

denisj
Copy link

@denisj denisj commented Feb 20, 2017

No description provided.

@rails-bot
Copy link

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rails team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @rafaelfranca (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ def self.find_by_session_id(*args)
class << self; remove_possible_method :find_by_session_id; end

def self.find_by_session_id(session_id)
where(session_id: session_id).first
where(session_id: session_id).take
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah!

@dapi
Copy link

dapi commented Apr 24, 2017

@denisj please click rebuild in travis. In this there was temporary error in travis

@denisj denisj closed this Apr 25, 2017
@denisj denisj reopened this Apr 25, 2017
@denisj
Copy link
Author

denisj commented Apr 25, 2017

@dapi the errors still occur

@rafaelfranca
Copy link
Member

Could you explain why the change?

@denisj
Copy link
Author

denisj commented May 12, 2017

@rafaelfranca I made that change to avoid implicit ordering on the primary key.

@sikachu
Copy link
Member

sikachu commented Mar 1, 2019

Oh, interesting.

Sorry for just noticing this patch now. Would you mind rebasing against master so you'll pickup the new Travis build matrix and hopefully the CI will pass?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants