Repository navigation
fix(async): publish weights before the next fully-async drain - #3343
Merged
Shi-Dong merged 2 commits intoSep 22, 2026
Merged
Conversation
Collaborator
|
@claude review always |
Shi-Dong
approved these changes
Sep 22, 2026
Shi-Dong
left a comment
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewed with local execution at c4f919f: 7/7 driver tests, with an exact fail-before on base (the two new fully-async ordering tests fail; the ordinary pipeline test passes unchanged). Re-verified after #3587 landed on main: the merge is conflict-free, and on the combined tree the driver tests (7/7) and the new argument-resolution tests (5/5) pass — the path-without-flag scenario from the review thread is closed by #3587 (path selection now enables the mode), so that thread can be resolved with a pointer to it.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Why
The fully-async rollout function owns a persistent producer that continues generating independently of get(). The driver still inherited the older finite-batch pipeline behavior: it started the next get() before training and waited for that batch before publishing weights.
Under fully async, get() is a consumer drain rather than the lifetime of generation. Waiting for it delays publication, does not quiesce the persistent producer, and makes the drain capture the previous weight version for staleness filtering.
This change separates those semantics without depending on an endpoint or transfer protocol. The weight-update protocol remains responsible for pausing, updating, versioning, and resuming engines.
Tests
Tested with: