Skip to content

Conversation

@gvmw
Copy link
Contributor

@gvmw gvmw commented Nov 3, 2021

I expect this to preempt some follow-up questions which I have seen come up a few times already. I encourage others to answer follow-up questions in the same way. It will save us from repeating the same answers, and sharing what we know to be true.

If you think that there is too much information in this README, we can split the questions into a separate file. I think that approach will fragment the information and make it less accessible, but I am open to what others feel would work better.

I expect this to preempt some follow-up questions which I have seen come
up a few times already. I enccourage others to answer follow-up
questions in the same way. It will save us from repeating the same
answers, and sharing what we know to be true.

If you think that there is too much information in this README, we can
split the questions into a separate file. I think that approach will
fragment the information and make it less accessible, but I am open to
what others feel would work better.

Signed-off-by: Gerhard Lazu <[email protected]>
@gvmw gvmw requested review from ChunyiLyu, ansd and mkuratczyk November 3, 2021 10:56
@gvmw
Copy link
Contributor Author

gvmw commented Nov 3, 2021

Follow-up to #401

@ChunyiLyu ChunyiLyu merged commit 5c77366 into main Nov 3, 2021
@ChunyiLyu ChunyiLyu deleted the extra-prroduction-ready-info branch November 3, 2021 14:48
gvmw added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 3, 2021
gvmw added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 3, 2021
Follow-up to #886

Signed-off-by: Gerhard Lazu <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants