-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 301
docs: link to revdepcheck fn #2105
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can't link to a topic in a package that's not on CRAN, which revdepcheck is not.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why can't you link to it? Is there a CRAN rule forbidding this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Technically you should have a formal dependency on a package to link to its help topics:
https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-devel/R-exts.html#Cross_002dreferences-1
In the past, you can sort of get away with a link to something you don't depend on, sometimes. But I would not go so far for a package that is not even on CRAN.
Also CRAN is now making static HTML reference manuals, which has triggered a big wave of requests to re-release packages cleaning up various documentation loose ends. So if anything, this is all going to get even stricter.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, didn't know that. Thanks for the references and explanations! I guess your reluctance is wise.
In general, I think linking to help topics would always lead to better UX than not linking, regardless of whether a package is installed or not, is on CRAN or not, etc. But of course CRAN comes up with yet another silly obstacle to sensible dev workflows1 in 2025... 🥳
Footnotes
After all, the R project is one of the last non-SVN related open-source projects that still hasn't switched to Git. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Addendum: We could link to the pkgdown documentation instead, WDYT?