Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Openssl 3.0.15+quic #171

Merged
merged 67 commits into from
Sep 12, 2024
Merged

Conversation

tmshort
Copy link
Member

@tmshort tmshort commented Sep 4, 2024

Checklist
  • documentation is added or updated
  • tests are added or updated

xl32 and others added 30 commits September 4, 2024 14:40
This adds a compatible API for BoringSSL's QUIC support, based
on the current |draft-ietf-quic-tls|.

Based on BoringSSL commit 3c034b2cf386b3131f75520705491871a2e0cafe
Based on BoringSSL commit c8e0f90f83b9ec38ea833deb86b5a41360b62b6a
Based on BoringSSL commit 3cbb0299a28a8bd0136257251a78b91a96c5eec8
Based on BoringSSL commit cc9d935256539af2d3b7f831abf57c0d685ffd81
Based on BoringSSL commit e6eef1ca16a022e476bbaedffef044597cfc8f4b
Based on BoringSSL commit 6f733791148cf8a076bf0e95498235aadbe5926d
Based on BoringSSL commit 384d0eaf1930af1ebc47eda751f0c78dfcba1c03
Based on BoringSSL commit a0373182eb5cc7b81d49f434596b473c7801c942
Based on BoringSSL commit b1b76aee3cb43ce11889403c5334283d951ebd37
Create quic_change_cipher_state() that does the minimal required
to generate the QUIC secrets. (e.g. encryption contexts are not
initialized).
Try to reduce unneeded whitespace changes and wrap new code to 80 columns.
Reword documentation to attempt to improve clarity.
Add some more sanity checks and clarifying comments to the code.
Update referenced I-D versions.
QUIC does not use the TLS KeyUpdate message/mechanism, and indeed
it is an error to generate or receive such a message.  Add the
necessary checks (noting that the check for receipt should be
redundant since SSL_provide_quic_data() is the only way to provide
input to the TLS layer for a QUIC connection).
For now, just test that we don't generate any, since we don't really
expose the mechanics for encrypting one and the QUIC API is not
integrated into the TLSProxy setup.
Make all data supplied via SSL_provide_quic_data() pass through an
internal buffer, so that we can handle data supplied with arbitrary
framing and only parse complete TLS records onto the list of QUIC_DATA
managed by quic_input_data_head/quic_input_data_tail.

This lets us remove the concept of "incomplete" QUIC_DATA structures,
and the 'offset' field needed to support them.

However, we've already moved the provided data onto the buffer by
the time we can check for KeyUpdate messages, so defer that check
to quic_get_message() (where it is adjacent to the preexisting
ChangeCipherSpec check).

To avoid extra memory copies, we also make the QUIC_DATA structures
just store offsets into the consolidated buffer instead of having copies
of the TLS handshake messages themselves.
The QUIC-TLS spec requires that TLS handshake messages do not cross
encryption level boundaries, but we were not previously enforcing this.
Prefix the shared library version with 17 (for 'Q'), to allow this
version to be used alongside a standard OpenSSL distribution

Add +quic to the version (i.e. build metadata)
tmshort and others added 12 commits September 4, 2024 14:41
Undo SSL_clear() changes in test
Break apart SSL_clear() into SSL_clear_quic() and SSL_clear_not_quic()
In SSL_clear(), call both functions
In SSL_accept(), call SSL_clear_not_quic()
Don't make the new functions public.
Add link to OMCs plans.
OpenSSL 3.0 is released, update tense.
Fix some typos.
Make relative URLs absolute.
@mcollina
Copy link

Are there any plans to release this soon?

@tmshort
Copy link
Member Author

tmshort commented Sep 12, 2024

I was waiting for approvals...

@wbl
Copy link
Collaborator

wbl commented Sep 12, 2024

Sorry for the delay, looking now

@@ -73,3 +73,29 @@ jobs:
with:
name: fips_checksum
path: artifact/
verify-checksums:
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's not clear this test is doing much for us anymore, and isn't redundant with above

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is pointless for us.

Copy link
Member

@richsalz richsalz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you only need watson, not me :)

@tmshort tmshort merged commit abde3b7 into quictls:openssl-3.0.15+quic Sep 12, 2024
77 of 80 checks passed
@tmshort tmshort deleted the openssl-3.0.15+quic branch September 12, 2024 21:27
@rapsys
Copy link

rapsys commented Sep 14, 2024

Hi,

Thanks for the merge and hard work.

When will the official release tarball be available ?

Best regards

@rapsys
Copy link

rapsys commented Sep 30, 2024

Could we have the final release for it please ?

@rapsys
Copy link

rapsys commented Sep 30, 2024

@tmshort @mcollina @wbl @richsalz sorry for the tag, I just need the official tarball to release it in Mageia, best regards.

@wbl
Copy link
Collaborator

wbl commented Sep 30, 2024

I think I just fixed the tag typo. Please confirm

@rapsys
Copy link

rapsys commented Sep 30, 2024

@wbl Thank's, it's released now ;) Hopefully we will get a version 3.3.x too soon ;)

@wbl
Copy link
Collaborator

wbl commented Sep 30, 2024

i just released the one we've been working on. This was hard due to some major refactors. Note that we've decided to fork harder, so look at github.com/quictls/quictls. We'd appreciate your input in deciding what to do.

@richsalz
Copy link
Member

What @wbl means, @rapsys, is that we are unlikely to do anything in the 3.3 line, and will instead be using https://github.com/quictls/quictls moving forward.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants