-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Drop the compatibility layer for the Big Reactive Rename #43005
Conversation
We did the change in 3.9 and the deprecations will be in 3.15 LTS so we can get rid of them.
Let's start with a draft as I might have left some tests around so let's catch them :). |
+100 for this |
🎊 PR Preview bd33359 has been successfully built and deployed to https://quarkus-pr-main-43005-preview.surge.sh/version/main/guides/
|
The TCK failure of |
Preparation for: quarkusio/quarkus#43005
We did the change in 3.9 and the deprecations will be in 3.15 LTS so we can get rid of them.
de6225c
to
fd78192
Compare
@geoand I was having a look this morning. It was due to: gsmet/resteasy-reactive-testsuite@762d369 . I chased all the test failures, it's now ready to go! |
Status for workflow
|
Awesome, thanks! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I obviously didn't review this, but I trust you and CI fully :)
Status for workflow
|
The change has been done in 3.9 and the deprecation will be in 3.15 LTS so we can now consider removing all this.
While our tendency would be to keep them forever, they come with a cost both in terms of size of BOM (which reflects in the build memory usage for all Quarkus projects), and in terms of config cost - we will reduce the number of interceptors quite a lot.