-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
WebSockets Next: honor the quarkus.http.root-path correctly #42075
Conversation
mkouba
commented
Jul 23, 2024
- i.e. do not use HttpRootPathBuildItem together with RouteBuildItem.builder()
So we need to figure out if we want this or not :) |
Well, the opening handshake goes over HTTP so I'd say we want this 🤷 |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Clement and I were both wondering on the Zulip thread... I am still unconvinced |
I agree with Martin because of the "upgrade" HTTP request. It could be debatable when you would use a direct, without-upgrade approach, but the initial HTTP request should honor the root path. Also, I think it's more consistent from a user POV. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The documentation should mention this.
Definitely |
f535c13
to
4bee31a
Compare
Done. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
- i.e. do not use HttpRootPathBuildItem together with RouteBuildItem.builder()
4bee31a
to
ae33dc9
Compare
Status for workflow
|
Status for workflow
|
🙈 The PR is closed and the preview is expired. |