Fix performance regression in 3 or more qubits RB#905
Closed
itoko wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
Contributor
Author
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Fix the performance regression of RB for 3 or more qubits Cliffords, which was introduced in the recent refactoring of RB module #898
Details and comments
Change back to avoid using slow
Clifford.composeas much as possible and use fasterQuantumCircuit.composeandClifford.from_circuitinstead for 3 or more qubits Cliffords, that was the technique used in the original code before #898 but missed to be included in #898.As shown in the table below, this PR recovers the original performance. (Code to measure the performance of 3Q RB)