Replace qiskit-terra dev requirement with qiskit#1329
Conversation
|
|
|
Sorry, I got mixed up about which things had been reverted or not. This looks good! |
|
Actually, one question (I will try to check but posting here before this merges) -- why do we have |
|
I looked up the 0.44 vs 0.45 issue. It is because 0.45 introduced singleton gates and (I think) the |
|
By the way, I was curious why the cron run from last night didn't fail. Because of the way we reverted things, we were specifying |
|
Ahh, that makes sense. We definitely were testing against Qiskit 0.45 because the rendered circuits are in the new |
…y#1329) ### Summary Now that the metapackage has been removed in Qiskit/qiskit#11271, we should be able to run the daily cron jobs against `qiskit` and not `qiskit-terra`.
…y#1329) ### Summary Now that the metapackage has been removed in Qiskit/qiskit#11271, we should be able to run the daily cron jobs against `qiskit` and not `qiskit-terra`.
Summary
Now that the metapackage has been removed in Qiskit/qiskit#11271, we should be able to run the daily cron jobs against
qiskitand notqiskit-terra.