Skip to content

Conversation

@Vysarat
Copy link
Contributor

@Vysarat Vysarat commented Apr 16, 2024

Summary: Running an executorch program via pybindings requires the aten_bridge. This currently fails if the model uses the int16 dtype. This diff adds support for the type by adding it to the conversion switch statements.

Differential Revision: D56199304

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Apr 16, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/3069

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit abecb73 with merge base 9931301 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Apr 16, 2024
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D56199304

Summary:

Running an executorch program via pybindings requires the aten_bridge. This currently fails if the model uses the `int16` dtype. This diff adds support for the type by adding it to the conversion switch statements.

Differential Revision: D56199304
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D56199304

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has been merged in eb664a0.

@mergennachin mergennachin mentioned this pull request Apr 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. fb-exported Merged

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants