Skip to content

Conversation

@swolchok
Copy link
Contributor

@swolchok swolchok commented Sep 10, 2025

We should be going through the runtime_wrapper for everything IIUC.

Differential Revision: D82127664

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Sep 10, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/14154

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

⏳ 271 Pending, 1 Unrelated Failure

As of commit a8ee90e with merge base 8358516 (image):

FLAKY - The following job failed but was likely due to flakiness present on trunk:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@meta-cla meta-cla bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Sep 10, 2025
@swolchok swolchok added the release notes: none Do not include this in the release notes label Sep 10, 2025
@swolchok
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swolchok has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

3 similar comments
@swolchok
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swolchok has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@swolchok
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swolchok has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@swolchok
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swolchok has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@swolchok
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swolchok has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

4 similar comments
@swolchok
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swolchok has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@swolchok
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swolchok has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@swolchok
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swolchok has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@swolchok
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swolchok has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

Base automatically changed from gh/swolchok/561/head to main September 11, 2025 16:28
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
…t least use buck query

Differential Revision: D82127663

Pull Request resolved: #14155
Differential Revision: D82127665

Pull Request resolved: #14156
Differential Revision: D82127666

Pull Request resolved: #14157
@swolchok swolchok force-pushed the gh/swolchok/562/head branch from 493de66 to a8ee90e Compare September 11, 2025 20:36
@swolchok
Copy link
Contributor Author

this was supposed to get merged automatically but there appears to have been a spurious conflict; will merge as soon as required jobs come back

@swolchok swolchok merged commit 6d8583d into main Sep 11, 2025
280 of 289 checks passed
@swolchok swolchok deleted the gh/swolchok/562/head branch September 11, 2025 20:56
swolchok added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2025
…sion (#14154)"

This reverts commit 6d8583d. Something went wrong with the automated merge of it + several PRs stacked on it initially, and my attempt to recover merged an old version.


ghstack-source-id: a148994
ghstack-comment-id: 3282883199
Pull-Request: #14233
swolchok added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2025
…sion (#14154)" (#14233)

This reverts commit 6d8583d. Something
went wrong with the automated merge of it + several PRs stacked on it
initially, and my attempt to recover merged an old version.
swolchok added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2025
Something went wrong with the automated merge here. This is an exact
export of the corresponding diff.

Differential Revision: D82127664
swolchok added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 12, 2025
Something went wrong with the automated merge here as well as the first
manual merge. This is an exact export of the corresponding diff.

Differential Revision: D82127664
StrycekSimon pushed a commit to nxp-upstream/executorch that referenced this pull request Sep 23, 2025
…torch#14154)

We should be going through the runtime_wrapper for everything IIUC.

Differential Revision:
[D82127664](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D82127664)
StrycekSimon pushed a commit to nxp-upstream/executorch that referenced this pull request Sep 23, 2025
…sion (pytorch#14154)" (pytorch#14233)

This reverts commit 6d8583d. Something
went wrong with the automated merge of it + several PRs stacked on it
initially, and my attempt to recover merged an old version.
StrycekSimon pushed a commit to nxp-upstream/executorch that referenced this pull request Sep 23, 2025
Something went wrong with the automated merge here. This is an exact
export of the corresponding diff.

Differential Revision: D82127664
StrycekSimon pushed a commit to nxp-upstream/executorch that referenced this pull request Sep 23, 2025
Something went wrong with the automated merge here as well as the first
manual merge. This is an exact export of the corresponding diff.

Differential Revision: D82127664
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. release notes: none Do not include this in the release notes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants