Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Delete CCI Linux and MacOS Unittest Jobs #3391

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

osalpekar
Copy link
Member

Deprecates the Linux and MacOS Unittest jobs now that they've been running on Nova for over a week.

Aside: There was also a stylecheck job that was dependent on the Linux Unittest job. I also put up #3390 to move that stylecheck job to Nova. I'm happy to reintroduce the CCI stylecheck job standalone in CCI if we want the Nova version to run on main for a week.

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented May 30, 2023

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/audio/3391

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 5 New Failures

As of commit 720543d:

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@osalpekar osalpekar changed the title Deprecate cci linux Deprecate CCI Linux and MacOS Unittest Jobs May 30, 2023
@osalpekar osalpekar requested a review from mthrok May 30, 2023 23:18
Copy link
Collaborator

@mthrok mthrok left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Though technically I think deletion is a better description than deprecation.

@osalpekar osalpekar changed the title Deprecate CCI Linux and MacOS Unittest Jobs Delete CCI Linux and MacOS Unittest Jobs May 31, 2023
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@osalpekar has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@osalpekar osalpekar force-pushed the deprecate_cci_linux branch from c7de0a2 to 10498b7 Compare May 31, 2023 22:39
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@osalpekar has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@osalpekar has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@osalpekar merged this pull request in d5d94b7.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 1, 2023

Hey @osalpekar.
You merged this PR, but labels were not properly added. Please add a primary and secondary label (See https://github.com/pytorch/audio/blob/main/.github/process_commit.py).


Some guidance:

Use 'module: ops' for operations under 'torchaudio/{transforms, functional}', and ML-related components under 'torchaudio/csrc' (e.g. RNN-T loss).

Things in "examples" directory:

  • 'recipe' is applicable to training recipes under the 'examples' folder,
  • 'tutorial' is applicable to tutorials under the “examples/tutorials” folder
  • 'example' is applicable to everything else (e.g. C++ examples)
  • 'module: docs' is applicable to code documentations (not to tutorials).
    Regarding examples in code documentations, please also use 'module: docs'.

Please use 'other' tag only when you’re sure the changes are not much relevant to users, or when all other tags are not applicable. Try not to use it often, in order to minimize efforts required when we prepare release notes.


When preparing release notes, please make sure 'documentation' and 'tutorials' occur as the last sub-categories under each primary category like 'new feature', 'improvements' or 'prototype'.

Things related to build are by default excluded from the release note, except when it impacts users. For example:
* Drop support of Python 3.7.
* Add support of Python 3.X.
* Change the way a third party library is bound (so that user needs to install it separately).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants