Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for quantize_() with Float8Linear module #1344
Add support for quantize_() with Float8Linear module #1344
Changes from 4 commits
00f9137
62bd5da
a73180d
dc1a233
dfdba92
f66e7ed
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can you just move your code snippet from the other file here:
and not need any changes to
torchao/float8
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@vkuzo what do you think about having dequantizing a model as a separate API? it feels a bit weird to have this logic in
_replace_with_custom_fn_if_matches_filter
which is supposed to be a simple module replacement function I feel.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
my 5c -
wdyt
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the motivation for adding a new API is making the dequantizing step more explicit for user, instead of hide it in a module replacement function.
but agree this can happen in parallel. also it's probably not worth spending time to discuss as of now, and wait until there are more use cases might be better