provider: consider explicit source when searching for a locked package with a source reference in the repository pool #8948
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Closed
radoering
force-pushed
the
provider-complete-locked-package-explicit
branch
from
f307fcb
to
0f60f53
Compare
4 tasks
radoering
force-pushed
the
provider-complete-locked-package-explicit
branch
2 times, most recently
from
eca230c
to
d7c44c5
Compare
radoering
force-pushed
the
provider-complete-locked-package-explicit
branch
from
d7c44c5
to
de0ac10
Compare
Secrus
approved these changes
Feb 13, 2024
…e with a source reference in the repository pool
radoering
force-pushed
the
provider-complete-locked-package-explicit
branch
from
de0ac10
to
0520cf3
Compare
|
This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs. |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull Request Check List
Resolves: #8928
1st commit: naive approach
test_providertest_provider(which both succed without the change)2nd commit: more sophisticated, robust approach