Skip to content

Remove obsolete code-quality CI workflow#363

Merged
neersighted merged 1 commit intopython-poetry:mainfrom
mkniewallner:remove-obsolete-code-quality-workflow
May 23, 2022
Merged

Remove obsolete code-quality CI workflow#363
neersighted merged 1 commit intopython-poetry:mainfrom
mkniewallner:remove-obsolete-code-quality-workflow

Conversation

@mkniewallner
Copy link
Member

@mkniewallner mkniewallner commented May 22, 2022

  • Added tests for changed code. Not applicable
  • Updated documentation for changed code. Not applicable

code-quality workflow only runs pre-commit, which is already handled by pre-commit CI, so it should not be required anymore.
For instance on #362, we can see those 2 workflows are doing the same thing:

Note that if this gets merged, the settings of the repository would need to be updated to remove Linting from the required checks.

neersighted
neersighted previously approved these changes May 23, 2022
@abn
Copy link
Member

abn commented May 23, 2022

Removed Linting from required checks.

@neersighted
Copy link
Member

Will need a rebase because of your other changes, @mkniewallner

The workflow only runs `pre-commit`, which is already handled by pre-commit CI,
so this should not be required anymore.
@mkniewallner mkniewallner force-pushed the remove-obsolete-code-quality-workflow branch from b0902c2 to c5d455c Compare May 23, 2022 20:57
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@mkniewallner
Copy link
Member Author

Will need a rebase because of your other changes, @mkniewallner

Thanks, branch has been rebased.

@neersighted neersighted merged commit 7e92c6f into python-poetry:main May 23, 2022
@mkniewallner mkniewallner deleted the remove-obsolete-code-quality-workflow branch May 23, 2022 21:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants