Use only autodoc to generate the API documentation

[DanielNoord]

As discussed in #1019 autoapi has some issues with typing annotations.

This creates almost parity with the current documentation. There are slight differences in lay-out and some additional classes get documented (they could be excluded by hand).
I tested this with the other PR and could build with make html without any validation errors. I'll rebase that PR on this one as a final test.

---

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://python-jsonschema--1021.org.readthedocs.build/en/1021/

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Base: 98.21% // Head: 98.21% // Increases project coverage by +0.00% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (8304e41) compared to base (2815178).
Patch coverage: 100.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1021   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.21%   98.21%           
=======================================
  Files          20       20           
  Lines        3529     3530    +1     
  Branches      537      537           
=======================================
+ Hits         3466     3467    +1     
  Misses         47       47           
  Partials       16       16           

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
jsonschema/_format.py	94.39% <ø> (ø)
jsonschema/exceptions.py	98.14% <100.00%> (+0.01%)	⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[DanielNoord]

I really have no idea how to fix this anymore. autodoc just seems unable to pick up TypeVars or aliases from imported modules. The documentation of a class from a private module in the index of the API reference (FormatChecker from _format) which uses a private alias from the module (_F) seems to completely throw off Sphinx and autodoc. I have searched online but wasn't able to find much help as to how this could be fixed...

As far as I can see now, I don't think any additional typing can be included into the documentation without completely restructuring it.

[Julian]

I can try to have a look in a bit, thanks for the efforts so far.

[Julian]

OK, the commit I just pushed I believe should move this forward.

[DanielNoord]

@Julian This looks perfect! Well done figuring this out, I wasn't able to...

I'm fine with merging!