Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document way to customize abbreviation (elipsis) on AssertionError #6682

Closed
ssbarnea opened this issue Feb 6, 2020 · 11 comments · Fixed by #8391 or #12662
Closed

Document way to customize abbreviation (elipsis) on AssertionError #6682

ssbarnea opened this issue Feb 6, 2020 · 11 comments · Fixed by #8391 or #12662
Labels
topic: reporting related to terminal output and user-facing messages and errors topic: rewrite related to the assertion rewrite mechanism type: bug problem that needs to be addressed

Comments

@ssbarnea
Copy link
Member

ssbarnea commented Feb 6, 2020

I keep getting errors that I cannot debug because the printed AssertionError is censored so much that makes impossible to see what was the difference.

Adding -vvvv did not help at all changing the way exceptions are rendered.

      assert l in out

E AssertionError: assert 'instance docker ansible default false false' in 'Instance Name Driver Name Provisioner Name Scenario Name Created Converged\n--------------- ---------...i-node false false\ninstance-2 docker ansible multi-node false false\n'

I did try to research the subject a lot online but I was not able to find any solution that would allow me to disable or customize when abbreviation happens, to make the limit upwards.

I raised this to PyTest because I am looking for a solution that can enable this at the entire test-suite and not on a specific file with tests, being able to do it globally is key for big projects.

Some resources I found:

@Zac-HD Zac-HD added topic: reporting related to terminal output and user-facing messages and errors type: question general question, might be closed after 2 weeks of inactivity labels Feb 6, 2020
@blueyed
Copy link
Contributor

blueyed commented Feb 6, 2020

Try env CI=true …, but it does not help here.
(It is an annoying thing, I know - there are some issues/ideas in that regard open already)
Related: blueyed#63
The problem here is that the internal pytest_assertrepr_compare hook does nothing here (for `op = "in"), and the assertion rewrite having it truncated already anyway.
Somehow related docs: https://github.com/blueyed/pytest/blob/49f6aaf725610acf67087b0a38dc69e636c7402f/doc/en/assert.rst#defining-your-own-explanation-for-failed-assertions

@Zac-HD Zac-HD added topic: rewrite related to the assertion rewrite mechanism type: bug problem that needs to be addressed and removed type: question general question, might be closed after 2 weeks of inactivity labels Feb 22, 2020
@ssbarnea
Copy link
Member Author

ssbarnea commented Mar 2, 2021

One year later and I am facing again the same issue, a bug caused by an incomplete feature, one that cannot be disabled, the truncation.

Can we please do something about it? For some projects this is testing PITA as the comparisons are almost always bigger than the limit and the user is left clueless to face the what is behind those ellipses? questions.

@nicoddemus
Copy link
Member

nicoddemus commented Mar 3, 2021

Indeed this is frustrating, thanks @ssbarnea for bringing it to light again.

I've opened #8391 as an attempt to fix this, feedback welcome.

@ssbarnea
Copy link
Member Author

ssbarnea commented Mar 3, 2021

I think it was #8391 -- going to test it now.

@nicoddemus
Copy link
Member

Oops yes, fixed my comment.

@ssbarnea
Copy link
Member Author

@nicoddemus I think that we need to reopen this issue because current behavior is still not ok. I found multiple similar unanswered question online such https://stackoverflow.com/questions/38000993/how-can-i-get-my-assertions-in-pytest-to-stop-being-abbreviated-with-ellipsis

IMHO, I think that we need to make these values configurable regardless of the verbosity level, especially as we know that changing general verbosity level has other side effects.

My opinion is that most people would want to run in minimal verbosity level (especially) on ci but have verbose errors for failed tests.

If I run in verbose by default displaying the console log in the browser can be problematic, true for github actions and also most CI/CD system I know (none behaves nice with very long console logs).

@bluetech
Copy link
Member

@ssbarnea
Copy link
Member Author

ssbarnea commented May 9, 2024

@bluetech That issue seems to never want to be go away... :p --- I tried, still same output with ellipses, in fact even calling pytest -vvvv does ellipsis....

[tool.pytest.ini_options]
verbosity_assertions = 4
verbosity_test_cases = 4

Output:

>       assert len(results) == len(expected), results
E       AssertionError: [[no-tabs] (Most files should not contain tabs.) matched examples/playbooks/rule-no-tabs.yml:10 Task/Handler: Foo, [no...hould not contain tabs.) matched examples/playbooks/rule-no-tabs.yml:37 Task/Handler: Should not trigger no-tabs rules]
E       assert 3 == 2
E        +  where 3 = len([[no-tabs] (Most files should not contain tabs.) matched examples/playbooks/rule-no-tabs.yml:10 Task/Handler: Foo, [no-tabs] (Most files should not contain tabs.) matched examples/playbooks/rule-no-tabs.yml:13 Task/Handler: Key has a tab, [no-tabs] (Most files should not contain tabs.) matched examples/playbooks/rule-no-tabs.yml:37 Task/Handler: Should not trigger no-tabs rules])
E        +  and   2 = len((13, 'Most files should not contain tabs.'))

Using latest 8.2.0. I put some breakpoints and tried to find what happens. Apparently the DEFAULT_REPR_MAX_SIZE = 240 and saferepr() is causing it to happen anyway:

  /Users/ssbarnea/c/os/pytest/src/_pytest/python.py(162)pytest_pyfunc_call()
    161     testargs = {arg: funcargs[arg] for arg in pyfuncitem._fixtureinfo.argnames}
--> 162     result = testfunction(**testargs)
    163     if hasattr(result, "__await__") or hasattr(result, "__aiter__"):

  /Users/ssbarnea/c/a/ansible-lint/src/ansiblelint/rules/no_tabs.py(92)test_no_tabs_rule()
     90             assert results[i].lineno == expected[0]
     91             assert results[i].message == expected[1]
---> 92         assert len(results) == len(expected), results

  /Users/ssbarnea/c/os/pytest/src/_pytest/assertion/rewrite.py(454)_format_assertmsg()
    453     if not isinstance(obj, str):
--> 454         obj = saferepr(obj)
    455         replaces.append(("\\n", "\n~"))

  /Users/ssbarnea/c/os/pytest/src/_pytest/_io/saferepr.py(112)saferepr()
    111     """
--> 112     return SafeRepr(maxsize, use_ascii).repr(obj)
    113 

  /Users/ssbarnea/c/os/pytest/src/_pytest/_io/saferepr.py(62)repr()
     61             else:
---> 62                 s = super().repr(x)
     63 

  /Users/ssbarnea/.asdf/installs/python/3.12.2/lib/python3.12/reprlib.py(59)repr()
     58     def repr(self, x):
---> 59         return self.repr1(x, self.maxlevel)
     60 

  /Users/ssbarnea/.asdf/installs/python/3.12.2/lib/python3.12/reprlib.py(67)repr1()
     66         if hasattr(self, 'repr_' + typename):
---> 67             return getattr(self, 'repr_' + typename)(x, level)
     68         else:

  /Users/ssbarnea/.asdf/installs/python/3.12.2/lib/python3.12/reprlib.py(110)repr_list()
    109     def repr_list(self, x, level):
--> 110         return self._repr_iterable(x, level, '[', ']', self.maxlist)
    111 

  /Users/ssbarnea/.asdf/installs/python/3.12.2/lib/python3.12/reprlib.py(98)_repr_iterable()
     97             repr1 = self.repr1
---> 98             pieces = [repr1(elem, newlevel) for elem in islice(x, maxiter)]
     99             if n > maxiter:

  /Users/ssbarnea/.asdf/installs/python/3.12.2/lib/python3.12/reprlib.py(69)repr1()
     68         else:
---> 69             return self.repr_instance(x, level)
     70 

  /Users/ssbarnea/c/os/pytest/src/_pytest/_io/saferepr.py(80)repr_instance()
     79         if self.maxsize is not None:
---> 80             s = _ellipsize(s, self.maxsize)
     81         return s

> /Users/ssbarnea/c/os/pytest/src/_pytest/_io/saferepr.py(29)_ellipsize()
     28     breakpoint()
---> 29     if len(s) > maxsize:
     30         i = max(0, (maxsize - 3) // 2)

@ncoghlan
Copy link

ncoghlan commented Jul 25, 2024

I became sufficiently frustrated with this limitation that I'm currently porting some tests over to unittest specifically to reliably obtain comprehensive diffs when the tests fail (the tests are comparing metadata structs, so they're not useful if the diffs get truncated)

One of the many issues I encountered while trying to find a definitive answer on how to get native pytest tests to reliably print full diffs (akin to unittest's maxDiff=None without dialling up the entire test suite execution to "spam me now" with -vv had suggested that assert_truncate_level=0 should work, but it turned out that was just a suggestion in a PR rather than a change that actually landed (the explicit warning about an unknown config setting was very useful in that regard, so thank you for that feature!).

It also isn't clear whether any of the suggested workarounds affect the error summary report at the end of the test suite execution (that is getting truncated even when the tests are implemented in unittest)

nicoddemus added a commit to nicoddemus/pytest that referenced this issue Jul 25, 2024
Seems like we just missed that case when more fine-grained verbosity levels were added.

Fixes pytest-dev#6682
nicoddemus added a commit to nicoddemus/pytest that referenced this issue Jul 25, 2024
Seems like we just missed that case when more fine-grained verbosity levels were added.

Fixes pytest-dev#6682
@nicoddemus
Copy link
Member

nicoddemus commented Jul 25, 2024

Sorry folks, seems we dropped the ball on this one. Opened #12662 with a proposed fix.

@ncoghlan
Copy link

Thanks @nicoddemus!

I agree that combined with the previous reference to https://docs.pytest.org/en/stable/reference/reference.html#confval-verbosity_assertions that change should cover both this issue and #12307

patchback bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 5, 2024
Seems like we just missed that case when more fine-grained verbosity levels were added.

Fixes #6682, #12307

(cherry picked from commit bc1e17e)
nicoddemus added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 5, 2024
…12687)

Seems like we just missed that case when more fine-grained verbosity levels were added.

Fixes #6682, #12307

(cherry picked from commit bc1e17e)

Co-authored-by: Bruno Oliveira <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
topic: reporting related to terminal output and user-facing messages and errors topic: rewrite related to the assertion rewrite mechanism type: bug problem that needs to be addressed
Projects
None yet
6 participants