Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix pipenv crashes #2388

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from
Closed
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions pipenv/core.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1889,12 +1889,16 @@ def do_install(
# Capture -e argument and assign it to following package_name.
more_packages = list(more_packages)
if package_name == '-e':
if not more_packages:
raise click.BadArgumentUsage('Please provide path to setup.py')
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This message could be misleading. We don’t want a path to setup.py, but to the directory containing it. I would use something like “path to editable package (e.g. the directory containing setup.py)” instead.

package_name = ' '.join([package_name, more_packages.pop(0)])
# capture indexes and extra indexes
line = [package_name] + more_packages
index_indicators = ['-i', '--index', '--extra-index-url']
index, extra_indexes = None, None
if more_packages and any(more_packages[0].startswith(s) for s in index_indicators):
if len(more_packages) < 2:
raise click.BadArgumentUsage('Please provide index value')
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I feel the logic in this block can be rewritten a bit to make the checks clearer. Right now the various checks are a bit convoluted, and require a lot of context to be understood. Why does it use more_packages here, but package_names below? How do they relate to line?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@maxkrivich maxkrivich Jun 20, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@uranusjr I agree with you about some extra context what you should keep in mind. I'll try to rewrite this block.

line, index = split_argument(' '.join(line), short='i', long_='index', num=1)
line, extra_indexes = split_argument(line, long_='extra-index-url')
package_names = line.split()
Expand Down