Merged
Conversation
Member
jessegrabowski
left a comment
jessegrabowski
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Seems like a reasonable short-term solution. Is there any functionality from scipy>1.14 that we care about?
Member
Author
I was not looking forward for anything there |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Due to #862 the CI started to fail
Given there is multiple work going on with GSOC that would be otherwise stalled or have to wait for #859 I suggest we temporarily upper pin scipy.
Related Issue
Checklist
Type of change