Skip to content

Conversation

@Viicos
Copy link
Member

@Viicos Viicos commented Mar 4, 2025

Change Summary

Related issue number

Checklist

  • Unit tests for the changes exist
  • Documentation reflects the changes where applicable
  • Pydantic tests pass with this pydantic-core (except for expected changes)
  • My PR is ready to review, please add a comment including the phrase "please review" to assign reviewers

@Viicos Viicos requested a review from dmontagu March 4, 2025 11:54
@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Mar 4, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #1659 will not alter performance

Comparing typed-dict-name (deabb98) with main (66c8c58)

Summary

✅ 157 untouched benchmarks

@Viicos Viicos merged commit 0761adb into main Mar 5, 2025
28 of 29 checks passed
@Viicos Viicos deleted the typed-dict-name branch March 5, 2025 08:05
davidhewitt pushed a commit to pydantic/pydantic that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2025
This aligns with other schemas, like the dataclass one where the class name is used as the validator name

Original-commit-hash: 0761adb
davidhewitt pushed a commit to pydantic/pydantic that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2025
This aligns with other schemas, like the dataclass one where the class name is used as the validator name

Original-commit-link: pydantic/pydantic-core@0761adb
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants