Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
8 changes: 4 additions & 4 deletions AGENTS.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ A state-changing GitHub call is the highest-blast-radius thing an agent does her

- **Write only to the current project's own repository.** Every state-changing call targets this project's `origin` and nothing else. A broad or logged-in identity is capability, not permission - a token that *can* reach another repository does not authorize writing to it. Writing to any other repository needs explicit, per-session human permission for that specific repository, and a "harmless test" write is still a write, so there is no probe exception. Reads from anywhere are fine.
- **Never fabricate, guess, or reuse an identifier passed to a write.** Every id a state-changing call consumes - a node id, a numeric id, a thread or comment id - is captured from a live query in the **same** session into a variable and passed from there. Do not hand-type an id, guess it, recall it from memory or an earlier session, or copy it from documentation or an example. Ids commonly resolve **globally**, so a wrong-but-valid id does not fail - it writes to the wrong target, in someone else's repository. If a query returns no id, stop rather than invent one to proceed.
- **A write is never a probe, and a write's output is never suppressed.** Never fire a state-changing call to see whether it works: decide it should happen, make it happen, and read the result. Never append output-discarding redirection or a force-success tail to a mutation (for example `>/dev/null`, `2>/dev/null`, `&>/dev/null`, `|| true`, `|| :`, `|| echo`) - the write's output is exactly what must be read. A write that appears to fail is **verified, not assumed harmless** - the operation may have succeeded on the server while the client reported an error - so confirm the actual state before retrying or moving on.
- **A write is never a probe, and a write's output is never suppressed.** Never fire a state-changing call to see whether it works: decide it should happen, make it happen, and read the result. Never append output-discarding redirection or a force-success tail to a mutation (for example `>/dev/null`, `2>/dev/null`, `&>/dev/null`, `|| true`, `|| :`, `|| echo`) - the write's output is exactly what must be read. A write that appears to fail is **verified, not assumed harmless** - the operation may have succeeded on the server while the client reported an error - so confirm the actual state before retrying or moving on. The ban targets hiding a *failure*. An ad-hoc call's response is the only signal you get, so `>/dev/null 2>&1`, `|| true`, or `|| echo` - which swallow the error stream or force success - are never acceptable on one. A committed script under `set -e` is a narrow exception: it may send a write's *stdout* to `/dev/null` to drop the success-response noise, because stderr stays visible and a failed write still aborts loudly (`repo-config/configure.sh` does exactly this). The exception is stdout-only suppression inside a reviewed, fail-loud script, never `2>&1` or a force-success tail, and never an ad-hoc command.

## Git and Commit Rules

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -184,13 +184,13 @@ Applies to code and workflow (`#`) comments alike.
The checks that separate work actually done from work that merely reports success. Their unifying property: **every failure below is green.** A skipped job and a passing job are indistinguishable in the aggregated required check; a pattern that matches less still exits zero; a gate that stops gating still reports success. No linter, status check, or review layer catches any of them.

- **A test must assert the mechanism it names.** Label each case by the behavior it proves, and satisfy yourself it would fail if that mechanism broke. A case that passes for an incidental reason - the right answer reached by the wrong path - is worse than no case, because it is later cited as evidence.
- **Gates, filters, and gate-like watchers fail loud, never narrow quietly.** A pattern that silently matches less, an allowlist that silently stops matching, or a gate that silently stops gating all report success while doing nothing. When a construct exists to notice something, make the not-noticing case produce an error or an annotation. The workflow instance of this is [`WORKFLOW.md`](./WORKFLOW.md) D8.4 (an identity allowlist used as a gate).
- **Gates, filters, and gate-like watchers fail loud, never narrow quietly.** A pattern that silently matches less, an allowlist that silently stops matching, or a gate that silently stops gating all report success while doing nothing. When a construct exists to notice something, make the not-noticing case produce an error or an annotation. An identity allowlist used as a gate, for one, must raise an error when its list stops matching, not silently pass everything through.
- **Run the repo's whole lint gate before every push, not the parts that look relevant.** CI runs all of them, so a partial local run only defers the failure - and the tool most likely to catch a given change is often the one it seems least about (an edit that manipulates line endings is exactly when `editorconfig-checker` matters). The invocations are in "Running the Linters Locally"; that section documents *how* to run each, this rule is that **all** of them run.
- **Editing CRLF files programmatically: `.` matches `\r` in a regex**, so a captured line keeps its carriage return and rejoining with `\r\n` yields `CRCRLF`. A text-mode rewrite has the mirror failure, silently flattening CRLF to LF. Prefer line-based edits (`splitlines(keepends=True)`) or literal replacement over regex reassembly. This is the mechanism behind the Line Endings warning above, and it is worth naming because the corruption is invisible in a rendered diff.
- **Never edit an active `.code-workspace` file.** A workspace file rewritten on disk can make VS Code reload the window, and a reload destroys the running agent session's context - the work in flight is lost with nothing to catch it, and the trigger is not fully characterized (an agent's edit has caused the reload where a human's identical edit did not). Surface the needed change for the maintainer to apply by hand.
- **A green check is not evidence the work happened.** A skipped job and a passing job are indistinguishable in the aggregated required check. When a job exists to exercise something, confirm from its log that it ran and produced the output it promises. (The `changes`-job rule under "Branching Model" is this rule's instance for that one job.)
- **A green check is not evidence the work happened.** A skipped job and a passing job are indistinguishable in the aggregated required check. When a job exists to exercise something, confirm from its log that it ran and produced the output it promises.
- **A workflow change is only fully exercised by CI.** Extracting a `run:` block and executing it locally validates the script and nothing else - `secrets: inherit`, `permissions:`, `needs:` wiring, and reusable-workflow inputs resolve only in a real run.
- **A review flags an instance; fix the class.** When a reviewer cites one stale claim, one silent-narrowing pattern, or one mis-worded contract, sweep for its siblings before replying. Reviewers sample; they do not enumerate.
- **A review flags an instance - fix the class.** When a reviewer cites one stale claim, one silent-narrowing pattern, or one mis-worded contract, sweep for its siblings before replying. Reviewers sample - they do not enumerate.

## PR Review Etiquette

Expand Down
4 changes: 3 additions & 1 deletion AUDIT.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -117,7 +117,9 @@ A repo is **operational** only if every applicable check passes. A single applic

Write `reports/<repo>/audit.md` from [`reports/_template.md`][template]: a dimension x {letter, intent, verdict, evidence} table with `file:line` citations (WORKFLOW.md 5A style), a drift section, and a list of proposed registry/spec updates (e.g. a resolved `classificationPending`). Rank findings most severe first.

**Findings are a point-in-time snapshot - stamp them and re-verify before acting.** [`spec/audit.py`][audit-runner] prints a run stamp (`audit run <UTC> | hub <sha>`) and, per repo, the exact commit it read (`@ <branch>@<sha>`). Anything derived from a run - a report, and especially an **onboarding or conformance issue** - quotes that stamp, so a reader can tell whether it still applies. A convergence issue is generated from the audit, never composed by hand: `spec/audit.py --issue <repo>` emits a ready-to-file title and body from that repo's live findings (grouped into must-fix, converge, and could-not-verify), so the issue content cannot drift from what the audit actually found and regenerates as the repo changes. An agent picking up such an issue **re-runs the audit first and acts on the live result, not the pasted findings**: a repo moves between filing and pickup, so a stale block leads an agent to "fix" what is already fixed (re-requesting secrets that exist, attempting a no-op forward-sync). State the findings as evidence for *why* the issue was filed, never as the current state.
**Findings are a point-in-time snapshot - stamp them and re-verify before acting.** [`spec/audit.py`][audit-runner] prints a run stamp (`audit run <UTC> | hub <sha>`) and, per repo, the exact commit it read (`@ <branch>@<sha>`). Anything derived from a run - a report, and especially an **onboarding or conformance issue** - quotes that stamp, so a reader can tell whether it still applies. A convergence issue is generated from the audit, never composed by hand: `spec/audit.py --issue <repo>` emits a ready-to-file title and body from that repo's live findings (grouped into must-fix, converge, and could-not-verify), so the issue content cannot drift from what the audit actually found and regenerates as the repo changes.

**Re-running the audit needs a full hub clone with git history.** The verbatim stale-vs-modified classification walks the canonical's history (`git log` / `git show` from the hub root), so a shallow clone or a files-only checkout cannot answer "matches a past hub revision" and those findings are unreliable there. A downstream agent verifying one finding without the full history can instead compare against the current hub canonical on `main` - the whole file for a file-level unit, or the named `## heading` block for a verbatim section - which decides current-match but not stale-vs-modified. An agent picking up such an issue **re-runs the audit first and acts on the live result, not the pasted findings**: a repo moves between filing and pickup, so a stale block leads an agent to "fix" what is already fixed (re-requesting secrets that exist, attempting a no-op forward-sync). State the findings as evidence for *why* the issue was filed, never as the current state.

**Reconcile `driftNotes` in the same pass.** A registry `driftNote` records a *current* deviation from the baseline. Once the deviation is resolved the note is deleted, not left describing finished work - hand-maintained prose drifts silently otherwise. `spec/audit.py` flags this: when a repo audits clean but a note still asserts outstanding work ("pending", "not yet", "missing", "behind", ...), it raises a drift finding naming the note.

Expand Down
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions CODESTYLE.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ Each language defines a **clean-compile** verification - the combination of buil

These apply repo-wide, in every directory:

1. **Markdown linting**: All `.md` files must be lint-clean (error and warning free) via the VS Code `markdownlint` extension. [`.markdownlint-cli2.jsonc`][markdownlint-cli2] at the repo root is the single source of truth - the davidanson `markdownlint` extension and a command-line `markdownlint-cli2` run both read it, so the IDE and CLI stay in lock-step. Rules it deliberately disables (e.g. `MD013` line-length) are **intentional** - do not "fix" them. `MD033` inline HTML stays **enabled**: inline HTML is allowed in comments only, and anything with a native markdown equivalent uses the markdown. Fix violations at the source rather than disabling rules.
1. **Markdown linting**: All `.md` files must be lint-clean (error and warning free) via the VS Code `markdownlint` extension. [`.markdownlint-cli2.jsonc`][markdownlint-cli2] at the repo root is the single source of truth - the davidanson `markdownlint` extension and a command-line `markdownlint-cli2` run both read it, so the IDE and CLI stay in lock-step. Rules it deliberately disables (e.g. `MD013` line-length) are **intentional** - do not "fix" them. `MD033` inline HTML stays **enabled**: HTML comments are permitted (markdownlint does not flag them), HTML elements are flagged, and anything with a native markdown equivalent uses the markdown. Fix violations at the source rather than disabling rules.
2. **Spelling**: All spelling must be clean via the CSpell VS Code integration; words must be correctly spelled in **US English** (the repo-wide convention - see [AGENTS.md][agents]). The shared `cspell.json` sets `"language": "en-US"` so British spellings are flagged - a bare `"en"` accepts both US and British and silently passes the wrong spelling. Project-specific terms go in the shared `cspell.json` `words` list - it is the single source of truth the extension, CLI, and CI all read. The `.code-workspace` must **not** carry its own `cspell.words`/`cSpell.words` block; when externalizing words into `cspell.json`, delete any word list left in the workspace (a leftover one duplicates the list and silently drifts).
3. **Spelling CI scope**: The enforced CI spell-check gate covers **`README.md` and `HISTORY.md` only** - these are the files every repo visitor sees, so they must be clean. It is deliberately **not** all `**/*.md`: repos carry many markdown files full of technical terms, and gating every one of them would mean endlessly padding `cspell.json` just to keep CI green. Broad, live spell-checking across any file (source, markdown, text) is the **cspell editor extension's** job, so typos still surface to whoever is editing. A repo owner **may** widen their own CI file list, but README + HISTORY are the default; keep the CI workflow, the `Lint: Spelling` VS Code task, and the AGENTS.md cspell one-liner on the same file list. The list is explicit (not a glob), so a repo that ships no `HISTORY.md` (e.g. one with no changelog) must drop it from all three surfaces and gate on `README.md` alone - cspell errors on a listed file that does not exist. Markdown *linting* (item 1) stays repo-wide `**/*.md` - it does not choke on technical terms.

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ This is the style guide for any **.NET projects** in this repo.
Shared MSBuild configuration is centralized at the repository root, never duplicated per project:

- **`Directory.Build.props`** carries the properties every project shares - the analyzer set and `TreatWarningsAsErrors` from the Zero Warnings Policy above, plus `LangVersion`, `TargetFramework` where uniform, and any repo-wide build metadata. A csproj carries only what is genuinely project-specific (`OutputType`, `IsPackable`, project references).
- **`Directory.Packages.props`** enables central package management (`ManagePackageVersionsCentrally` true): every dependency version is declared once as a `PackageVersion` item, and a csproj's `PackageReference` items are versionless. One file to review on a bump, one Dependabot surface, and no version skew between projects.
- **`Directory.Packages.props`** owns central package management: it sets `ManagePackageVersionsCentrally` to `true` (in this file, not `Directory.Build.props`) and declares every dependency version once as a `PackageVersion` item, so a csproj's `PackageReference` items are versionless. One file to review on a bump, one Dependabot surface, and no version skew between projects.

A repo whose projects still carry per-project analyzer settings or versioned `PackageReference` items is drifted - move the shared property or version up to the root file rather than editing it in place.

Expand Down
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -136,6 +136,7 @@ Running backlog (kept here, in a committed file, so the guidance survives across
- Canonicalize Python linter-config placement on `pyproject.toml` (one cataloged repo uses standalone `.ruff.toml` + `pyrightconfig.json`); track as a drift finding, fix downstream.
- Consider renaming this repo to reflect the audit-catalog identity (updates badge and link URLs across the fleet).
- Adopt the OCI annotation keys (`org.opencontainers.image.*`) for Docker image metadata across the Docker repos, replacing the ad-hoc and `org.label-schema.*` labels (from #363).
- Sweep `ManagePackageVersionsCentrally` placement to `Directory.Packages.props` fleet-wide (PlexCleaner sets it in `Directory.Build.props`, off the CODESTYLE canonical).
- Finish onboarding hardening (from #310): make the `AUDIT.md` audit a required onboarding step and run the per-type cold-start self-tests tracked in `reports/conformance-matrix.md` (`STANDUP.md` is already in place).

## License
Expand Down
Loading