Skip to content

Give the Closing-Reference Line Its Own Template Field #1079

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
ptr727 merged 1 commit into from
Aug 29, 2026
Merged

Give the Closing-Reference Line Its Own Template Field #1079

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions .agents/skills/local-strict-review/SKILL.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -48,8 +48,8 @@ Rules that bind this task: quote `code-review`'s "Review the Change" section int
the Return line below, not a PR comment or a coverage marker.
Return: one finding per line, file:line, the concrete failure scenario, no severity theater.
Bounds: read-only. No edit, no stage, no commit, no push, no PR-hosted write of any kind.
Close with the unresolved-rule closing line from `AGENTS.md` "Context and Delegation
Discipline", referenced rather than restated here.
Close: quote `AGENTS.md`'s own unresolved-rule closing line ("Context and Delegation
Discipline") into the prompt, do not restate it here.
```

**Model tier:** the strongest tier this session can reach, per `AGENTS.md` "Match the model tier to the judgment" and "Never tier down the seat holding the judgment", applied here to the reviewer rather than the author. Run the pass on the same tier that authored the change when only one tier is reachable, a second, adversarially-prompted look still catches what the authoring pass's own "looks ready" judgment did not.
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion .claude-plugin/fleet-skills/.source-digest
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1 +1 @@
126057363d858c0a
4dbdf71167625f52
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions .claude-plugin/fleet-skills/skills/local-strict-review/SKILL.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -48,8 +48,8 @@ Rules that bind this task: quote `code-review`'s "Review the Change" section int
the Return line below, not a PR comment or a coverage marker.
Return: one finding per line, file:line, the concrete failure scenario, no severity theater.
Bounds: read-only. No edit, no stage, no commit, no push, no PR-hosted write of any kind.
Close with the unresolved-rule closing line from `AGENTS.md` "Context and Delegation
Discipline", referenced rather than restated here.
Close: quote `AGENTS.md`'s own unresolved-rule closing line ("Context and Delegation
Discipline") into the prompt, do not restate it here.
```

**Model tier:** the strongest tier this session can reach, per `AGENTS.md` "Match the model tier to the judgment" and "Never tier down the seat holding the judgment", applied here to the reviewer rather than the author. Run the pass on the same tier that authored the change when only one tier is reachable, a second, adversarially-prompted look still catches what the authoring pass's own "looks ready" judgment did not.
Expand Down
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions .github/skills/local-strict-review/SKILL.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -48,8 +48,8 @@ Rules that bind this task: quote `code-review`'s "Review the Change" section int
the Return line below, not a PR comment or a coverage marker.
Return: one finding per line, file:line, the concrete failure scenario, no severity theater.
Bounds: read-only. No edit, no stage, no commit, no push, no PR-hosted write of any kind.
Close with the unresolved-rule closing line from `AGENTS.md` "Context and Delegation
Discipline", referenced rather than restated here.
Close: quote `AGENTS.md`'s own unresolved-rule closing line ("Context and Delegation
Discipline") into the prompt, do not restate it here.
```

**Model tier:** the strongest tier this session can reach, per `AGENTS.md` "Match the model tier to the judgment" and "Never tier down the seat holding the judgment", applied here to the reviewer rather than the author. Run the pass on the same tier that authored the change when only one tier is reachable, a second, adversarially-prompted look still catches what the authoring pass's own "looks ready" judgment did not.
Expand Down