Skip to content

Conversation

@rolfyone
Copy link
Collaborator

Name

Stefan Bratanov/@StefanBratanov

Teku

https://github.com/ConsenSys/teku/graphs/contributors

Eligibility

Stefan has been with the teku team since April, 2022 as a senior developer. He's done a lot of work on MEV, amongst other things in the teku code base.

Miscellaneous

  • also updated numbering after teku, but possibly numbers in this list may become annoying...
  • fixed some formatting at the bottom to make it consistent.

Copy link
Contributor

@ajsutton ajsutton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Definitely has my support. Stefan is a key part of the core Teku team.

@tbenr
Copy link
Collaborator

tbenr commented Oct 26, 2022

I am 100% in favour of including Stefan..

@LukaszRozmej
Copy link
Collaborator

Not a no but I thought MEV was considered something outside of core protocol and not making towards direct eligibility for PG.

@potuz
Copy link
Collaborator

potuz commented Oct 28, 2022

I think MEV was a misnomer here, looking at his PRs it looks to me that he's contributed a bit to the builder API implementation of Teku. This is an integral part of CL clients unfortunately

@rolfyone
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Sorry, I was referring to the CL implementation that enables MEV, as an example of the mainnet contributions that Stefan has been working on. Builder api / bug fixing and anything else that comes up on teku, he's a full time resource on our team.

@tbenr
Copy link
Collaborator

tbenr commented Oct 29, 2022

Builder apis are part of the CL spec. But Stefan hasn't done only that. He recently implemented failover functionality for VC connection towards multiple BN endpoints. He is a fully effective teku team member.

@tvanepps tvanepps merged commit 6a27ef0 into protocolguild:main Nov 14, 2022
etan-status pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 29, 2024
Grammar + consistency changes - 6-guidelines-for-regular-operation.md
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants