Conversation
WalkthroughDocker sandbox support was added to the code execution protocol via a new Sandbox type and Request.Sandbox. Integration tests for virtual environments were added (Linux-only), and several indirect dependencies were bumped (notably OpenTelemetry and golang.org/x/time). Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant Request
participant useSandbox
participant Eval
participant EvalWithVirtualEnv
Client->>Request: Submit execution request
Request->>useSandbox: Is sandbox configured?
alt sandbox configured
useSandbox-->>Request: yes
Request->>EvalWithVirtualEnv: Execute using Docker sandbox (WorkingDir, Image)
EvalWithVirtualEnv-->>Request: Execution result
else no sandbox
useSandbox-->>Request: no
Request->>Eval: Execute normally
Eval-->>Request: Execution result
end
Request-->>Client: Return result
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
@coderabbitai create an issue for this PR: it depends on projectdiscovery/gozero#25 and introduces execution of nuclei code templates into a virtualized docker enviroment |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. 🧩 Analysis chain🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 54 @Mzack9999: I've created issue #6582 for this PR. The issue includes:
You can view the issue here: #6582 |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
pkg/protocols/code/code.go (1)
49-52: LGTM! Consider adding field validation.The Sandbox struct is well-defined with appropriate YAML/JSON tags. However, consider adding validation in the future to ensure WorkingDir (if provided) is an absolute path and Image is a valid Docker image reference.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumintegration_tests/protocols/code/py-virtual.yamlis excluded by!**/*.yamlintegration_tests/protocols/code/sh-virtual.yamlis excluded by!**/*.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
cmd/integration-test/code.go(1 hunks)go.mod(4 hunks)pkg/protocols/code/code.go(5 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
**/*.go
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)
**/*.go: Format Go code using go fmt
Run static analysis with go vet
Files:
cmd/integration-test/code.gopkg/protocols/code/code.go
pkg/protocols/**/*.go
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)
Each protocol implementation must provide a Request interface with methods Compile(), ExecuteWithResults(), Match(), and Extract()
Files:
pkg/protocols/code/code.go
🧬 Code graph analysis (2)
cmd/integration-test/code.go (1)
pkg/testutils/integration.go (1)
TestCase(247-250)
pkg/protocols/code/code.go (1)
pkg/protocols/protocols.go (1)
Request(308-333)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
pkg/protocols/code/code.go (2)
479-481: LGTM! Sandbox detection logic is clear.The
useSandbox()helper correctly checks both that Sandbox is not nil and that Image is non-empty, which is the minimum requirement for Docker execution.
255-265: Sandbox configuration lacks pre-flight validation before passing to gozero.The
useSandbox()method (line 480) validates only thatSandboxis non-nil andImageis non-empty. TheWorkingDirfield andImageformat are never validated before construction ofDockerConfigurationat lines 260–263. While error handling exists downstream (line 271), the absence of local validation means invalid paths or malformed Docker image references will only surface as runtime errors from gozero.Add validation for:
Image: Verify it matches valid Docker image reference formatWorkingDir: Validate path constraints (absolute path, accessible, etc.)Alternatively, document that gozero performs these validations and handles invalid configurations gracefully.
cmd/integration-test/code.go (1)
27-28: LGTM! Linux-gated virtual environment tests added.The new test cases for sandbox-based code execution are appropriately gated to Linux-only environments, which is correct for Docker-based virtualization. The test cases reuse the existing
codeSnippetimplementation, maintaining consistency with the test suite structure.go.mod (1)
101-101: No security advisories found for the updated dependencies.The verification check against GitHub's security advisory database confirms that none of the updated dependencies (gozero, OpenTelemetry suite, golang.org/x/time, and backoff/v5) have known security vulnerabilities in their current versions.
2 participants
Proposed changes
Checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit