-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Coverage #145
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Makefile, specifically updating the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Makefile
(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: build (3.12)
- GitHub Check: build (3.11)
- GitHub Check: build (3.10)
test: | ||
uv run pytest -c pyproject.toml --cov-report=html --cov=lighter tests/ | ||
$(MAKE) coverage |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Simplify test command and improve coverage visibility
The test command can be improved in two ways:
- Remove redundant
tests/
specification as it's already configured inpyproject.toml
- Add term-missing report for better CI visibility while keeping HTML report
- uv run pytest -c pyproject.toml --cov-report=html --cov=lighter tests/
+ uv run pytest -c pyproject.toml --cov-report=term-missing --cov-report=html --cov=lighter
🔗 Analysis chain
Consider keeping term-missing coverage report for CI visibility.
The switch from --cov-report=term-missing
to --cov-report=html
makes coverage results less visible in CI logs. Consider using both formats:
- uv run pytest -c pyproject.toml --cov-report=html --cov=lighter tests/
+ uv run pytest -c pyproject.toml --cov-report=term-missing --cov-report=html --cov=lighter tests/
Also, verify if the tests/
directory specification is necessary since this is typically configured in pyproject.toml
.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if testpaths is already configured in pyproject.toml
cat pyproject.toml | grep -A 5 "\[tool.pytest.ini_options\]"
Length of output: 316
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Commitable suggestion
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@surajpaib Here's the updated command:
test:
uv run pytest -c pyproject.toml --cov-report=term-missing --cov-report=html --cov=lighter
$(MAKE) coverage
.PHONY: coverage | ||
coverage: | ||
uvx coverage-badge -o assets/images/coverage.svg -f |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Only directory creation is needed, other prerequisites are met
The coverage-badge tool is already properly configured as a dev dependency in pyproject.toml, and the -f
flag without an argument defaults to .coverage
, so only the directory creation suggestion is relevant:
.PHONY: coverage
coverage:
+ mkdir -p assets/images
uvx coverage-badge -o assets/images/coverage.svg -f
🔗 Analysis chain
Ensure coverage badge generation prerequisites are met.
A few suggestions to make the coverage target more robust:
- Create the output directory if it doesn't exist
- Add coverage-badge to development dependencies
- Specify the desired format for the badge
.PHONY: coverage
coverage:
+ mkdir -p assets/images
- uvx coverage-badge -o assets/images/coverage.svg -f
+ uvx coverage-badge -o assets/images/coverage.svg -f ".coverage"
Also verify that coverage-badge is installed:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if coverage-badge is listed in development dependencies
cat pyproject.toml | grep -A 10 "\[tool.poetry.group.dev.dependencies\]"
Length of output: 74
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for dependency configuration files
echo "=== Checking for dependency files ==="
ls -la pyproject.toml requirements*.txt setup.py 2>/dev/null || echo "No standard Python dependency files found"
echo -e "\n=== Searching for uvx or coverage-badge mentions ==="
rg -l "uvx|coverage-badge" . || echo "No mentions found"
Length of output: 502
Script:
#!/bin/bash
echo "=== Checking pyproject.toml content ==="
cat pyproject.toml
echo -e "\n=== Checking CONTRIBUTING.md for relevant info ==="
rg -A 5 -B 5 "uvx|coverage-badge" CONTRIBUTING.md
echo -e "\n=== Checking uv.lock content ==="
head -n 20 uv.lock
Length of output: 5469
Description
Related Issue
Type of Change
Checklist
CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
document.CONTRIBUTING.md
guide.make codestyle
.Summary by CodeRabbit