Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Coverage #145

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 31, 2025
Merged

Coverage #145

merged 5 commits into from
Jan 31, 2025

Conversation

surajpaib
Copy link
Collaborator

@surajpaib surajpaib commented Jan 31, 2025

Description

Related Issue

Type of Change

  • 📚 Examples / docs / tutorials / dependencies update
  • 🔧 Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • 🥂 Improvement (non-breaking change which improves an existing feature)
  • 🚀 New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • 💥 Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • 🔐 Security fix

Checklist

  • I've read the CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md document.
  • I've read the CONTRIBUTING.md guide.
  • I've updated the code style using make codestyle.
  • I've written tests for all new methods and classes that I created.
  • I've written the docstring in Google format for all the methods and classes that I used.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated test configuration to run tests with enhanced coverage reporting.
    • Added a new target to generate a coverage badge for project metrics.

@dosubot dosubot bot added the size:XS This PR changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jan 31, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 31, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the Makefile, specifically updating the test target and adding a new coverage target. The test target now runs pytest with the --cov-report=html option and specifies the tests/ directory for test discovery. A new coverage target has been introduced to generate a coverage badge using the uvx coverage-badge command, outputting the result to assets/images/coverage.svg. The coverage target is defined as a phony target, ensuring it is always executed.

Changes

File Change Summary
Makefile - Updated test target to run pytest with --cov-report=html and specify tests/ for test discovery.
- Added new coverage phony target to generate coverage badge using uvx coverage-badge, outputting to assets/images/coverage.svg.

Poem

🐰 In the garden of code, we frolic and play,
Tests now report in a bright, new way.
A badge for our coverage, shining so bright,
Guiding our efforts, a joyful delight.
With each little hop, our quality grows! 🏅


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@surajpaib
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@ibro45

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fe21f05 and 687c4c2.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Makefile (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: build (3.12)
  • GitHub Check: build (3.11)
  • GitHub Check: build (3.10)

Comment on lines +29 to +31
test:
uv run pytest -c pyproject.toml --cov-report=html --cov=lighter tests/
$(MAKE) coverage
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot Jan 31, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Simplify test command and improve coverage visibility

The test command can be improved in two ways:

  • Remove redundant tests/ specification as it's already configured in pyproject.toml
  • Add term-missing report for better CI visibility while keeping HTML report
-	uv run pytest -c pyproject.toml --cov-report=html --cov=lighter tests/
+	uv run pytest -c pyproject.toml --cov-report=term-missing --cov-report=html --cov=lighter
🔗 Analysis chain

Consider keeping term-missing coverage report for CI visibility.

The switch from --cov-report=term-missing to --cov-report=html makes coverage results less visible in CI logs. Consider using both formats:

-	uv run pytest -c pyproject.toml --cov-report=html --cov=lighter tests/
+	uv run pytest -c pyproject.toml --cov-report=term-missing --cov-report=html --cov=lighter tests/

Also, verify if the tests/ directory specification is necessary since this is typically configured in pyproject.toml.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if testpaths is already configured in pyproject.toml
cat pyproject.toml | grep -A 5 "\[tool.pytest.ini_options\]"

Length of output: 316

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Commitable suggestion

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@surajpaib Here's the updated command:

test: 
	uv run pytest -c pyproject.toml --cov-report=term-missing --cov-report=html --cov=lighter
	$(MAKE) coverage

Comment on lines +33 to +35
.PHONY: coverage
coverage:
uvx coverage-badge -o assets/images/coverage.svg -f
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Only directory creation is needed, other prerequisites are met

The coverage-badge tool is already properly configured as a dev dependency in pyproject.toml, and the -f flag without an argument defaults to .coverage, so only the directory creation suggestion is relevant:

 .PHONY: coverage
 coverage:
+	mkdir -p assets/images
 	uvx coverage-badge -o assets/images/coverage.svg -f
🔗 Analysis chain

Ensure coverage badge generation prerequisites are met.

A few suggestions to make the coverage target more robust:

  1. Create the output directory if it doesn't exist
  2. Add coverage-badge to development dependencies
  3. Specify the desired format for the badge
 .PHONY: coverage
 coverage:
+	mkdir -p assets/images
-	uvx coverage-badge -o assets/images/coverage.svg -f
+	uvx coverage-badge -o assets/images/coverage.svg -f ".coverage"

Also verify that coverage-badge is installed:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if coverage-badge is listed in development dependencies
cat pyproject.toml | grep -A 10 "\[tool.poetry.group.dev.dependencies\]"

Length of output: 74


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for dependency configuration files
echo "=== Checking for dependency files ==="
ls -la pyproject.toml requirements*.txt setup.py 2>/dev/null || echo "No standard Python dependency files found"

echo -e "\n=== Searching for uvx or coverage-badge mentions ==="
rg -l "uvx|coverage-badge" . || echo "No mentions found"

Length of output: 502


Script:

#!/bin/bash
echo "=== Checking pyproject.toml content ==="
cat pyproject.toml

echo -e "\n=== Checking CONTRIBUTING.md for relevant info ==="
rg -A 5 -B 5 "uvx|coverage-badge" CONTRIBUTING.md

echo -e "\n=== Checking uv.lock content ==="
head -n 20 uv.lock

Length of output: 5469

@surajpaib surajpaib requested a review from ibro45 January 31, 2025 20:16
@ibro45 ibro45 merged commit 8dc5cba into main Jan 31, 2025
3 checks passed
@ibro45 ibro45 deleted the coverage branch January 31, 2025 22:40
@ibro45 ibro45 restored the coverage branch February 1, 2025 00:02
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Feb 1, 2025
11 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
size:XS This PR changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants